Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Colofornian

I’m talking about the election, not the primaries. Read my post again.


58 posted on 10/04/2007 10:56:08 AM PDT by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: Bobkk47
I’m talking about the election, not the primaries. Read my post again.

Yeah, but what stage are we at again? Of course, there will be some divisions at this stage.

Secondly, these divisions are "good" in the sense that they send a longer-term message:

(a) The Republican base won't support, say, a pro-abortion Republican candidate. If the rest of the Republicans insist on putting forth such a candidate, well, at least they can't say in November, "Why didn't you tell us you'd stay home or vote for a third party?" Simply put: Strong, adverse reactions to certain candidates should send a longer-term signal (beyond the primaries)

(b) This long-term signal needs to be beamed even beyond the general election; elsewise, the party is sunk long-term. A party that plans on ignoring its base long-term is pure & simple, "sunk." The Big Tent can't become a circus.

111 posted on 10/04/2007 11:51:15 AM PDT by Colofornian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson