Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DanielLongo

I quoted the Young’s literal translation. I did not insert something not in that translation. The first verse addresses the ‘speaking to in the prophets’ then contrasts that method with ‘speaking to in His Son’. The name Jesus has been given is greater than the Angels, clearly, but the ones through whom God spoke before the coming of Jesus Christ were the prophets, the messengers He used then, as Jesus is the messenger He uses now.


536 posted on 10/05/2007 2:29:48 PM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support. Defend life support for others in the womb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 530 | View Replies ]


To: MHGinTN

And I posted the rest of the versus and showed where you are in error.


547 posted on 10/05/2007 4:12:14 PM PDT by DanielLongo (Don't Tread On Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 536 | View Replies ]

To: MHGinTN
I quoted the Young’s literal translation.
 
Bah!!
 
You call that screed a TRANSLATION??!!??
Why... it says things you WANT it to say!
 
 
Why, I'll bet he didn't even look into a hat and use the U&T!!!
 
 
--MrmonDude(I know a 'translation; and that wuz NO translation, but some dreamers opinion!)

572 posted on 10/06/2007 4:57:34 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 536 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson