That’s funny, I heard Mitt on Hugh Hewitt last night clearly refuting what Media Matters put out and clearly defending Rush.
You heard him on his flop, but he first flipped and you apparently missed that or have chosen to ignore it (flipped off Rush proving his lack of discernment because he first accept what the democrat operatives lied about what Rush said).
That's now. Five days ago, he criticized Rush: http://www.blogrunner.com/snapshot/D/2/3/romney_criticizes_limbaugh/
What's really ironic is that Media Matters has targetted Mitt, too. You'd think that given that fact, ol' Mitt would have taken their spin with a grain of salt, if not the whole shaker. The fact that he didn't does not reflect well on his "reasoning" skills.
I'm sure there was some significant blowblack, so now Mitt's spinning a different tune. This doesn't convince me, he's just doing (and tried to do in the first place) what's politically expedient. Can you say "slick," but just not that good at it? Definitely not Presidential material.
PS I would vote for him over sHrillary. Then again, I'd vote for a gerbil over sHrillary...
“That’s funny, I heard Mitt on Hugh Hewitt last night clearly refuting what Media Matters put out and clearly defending Rush.”
Romney did not address the press release that he sent to the Huffington Post joining the attack on Rush.
Romney did not address any aspect of his having “thrown Rush under the bus”.
Romney has not acknowledged any thing about what Rush told his audience yesterday about Romney’s attack on him, an attack that even after today’s show is still hanging out there.
Romney has not contacted Rush or apologized, and Rush reinforced that today.