That's now. Five days ago, he criticized Rush: http://www.blogrunner.com/snapshot/D/2/3/romney_criticizes_limbaugh/
What's really ironic is that Media Matters has targetted Mitt, too. You'd think that given that fact, ol' Mitt would have taken their spin with a grain of salt, if not the whole shaker. The fact that he didn't does not reflect well on his "reasoning" skills.
I'm sure there was some significant blowblack, so now Mitt's spinning a different tune. This doesn't convince me, he's just doing (and tried to do in the first place) what's politically expedient. Can you say "slick," but just not that good at it? Definitely not Presidential material.
PS I would vote for him over sHrillary. Then again, I'd vote for a gerbil over sHrillary...
If Mr. Limbaugh made the remark he is reported to have made, it reflects very poorly on him."
This is all Romney said because he had not heard the original story!And you are trying to make a hay out of this!
News flash not everyone listens to talk radio if they are focused on a champaign!
I don't hear Rush making a deal out of this and I a member of his EIB link to hear all of his programs!
I have read a lot of hear say!
The Huffington piece there are parts missing for it appears to cut and jumps!
To say might have voted for Mitt causes to doubt for get your news from a negative blog!