[chuckles]

I would like to say what my battle plans would be, but that would just start another big fuss over my "over reaction". Lets just say, the N. Koreans wouldn't have a chance to get many rounds off. I believe in overwhelming force. That includes EVERYTHING. The reason I made my first comment was to show I would make the battle short and sweet. I have little patience for playing back and forth body count. I like it more one sided. Also if a couple of nukes were used, maybe other provocateurs would figure I'm not playing around. They set off a nuke to start the mess in the first place.

Everybody's first reaction is conventional warfare. All that does is cause what we are in in Iraq right now. If Iran wants to have nukes, we should supply them with some in Tehran and Natanz. They think we don't have the will to stand up to them is why we are having these problems now. I feel sorry for the people that don't support the regime, but why do we have to wait for a mushroom cloud here before we get "real mad".

[Spktyr]

Prevailing winds and geography would ensure that any nukes used against the NK forces would also end up destroying Seoul - either through blast effects or through fallout/radiaton. Do you think that killing millions of our ally’s citizens is a good idea?????