Posted on 10/04/2007 9:39:34 AM PDT by Parmenio
A meticulously planned, brilliantly executed surgical strike by Israeli jets on a nuclear installation in Syria on 6 September may have saved the world from a devastating threat. The only problem is that no one outside a tight-lipped knot of top Israeli and American officials knows precisely what that threat involved. Even more curious is that far from pushing the Syrians and Israelis to war, both seem determined to put a lid on the affair. One month after the event, the absence of hard information leads inexorably to the conclusion that the implications must have been enormous.
That was confirmed to The Spectator by a very senior British ministerial source: If people had known how close we came to world war three that day thered have been mass panic. Never mind the floods or foot-and-mouth Gordon really would have been dealing with the bloody Book of Revelation and Armageddon.
According to American sources, Israeli intelligence tracked a North Korean vessel carrying a cargo of nuclear material labelled cement as it travelled halfway across the world. On 3 September the ship docked at the Syrian port of Tartous and the Israelis continued following the cargo as it was transported to the small town of Dayr as Zawr, near the Turkish border in north-eastern Syria.
The destination was not a complete surprise. It had already been the subject of intense surveillance by an Israeli Ofek spy satellite, and within hours a band of elite Israeli commandos had secretly crossed into Syria and headed for the town. Soil samples and other material they collected there were returned to Israel. Sure enough, they indicated that the cargo was nuclear. Three days after the North Korean consignment arrived, the final phase of Operation Orchard was launched. With prior approval from Washington, Israeli F151 jets were scrambled and, minutes later, the installation and its newly arrived contents were destroyed.
So secret were the operational details of the mission that even the pilots who were assigned to provide air cover for the strike jets had not been briefed on it until they were airborne. In the event, they were not needed: built-in stealth technology and electronic warfare systems were sophisticated enough to blind Syrias Russian-made anti-aircraft systems.
What was in the consignment that led the Israelis to mount an attack which could easily have spiralled into an all-out regional war? It could not have been a transfer of chemical or biological weapons; Syria is already known to possess the most abundant stockpiles in the region. Nor could it have been missile delivery systems; Syria had previously acquired substantial quantities from North Korea. The only possible explanation is that the consignment was nuclear. The scale of the potential threat and the intelligence methods that were used to follow the transfer explain the dense mist of official secrecy that shrouds the event. There have been no official briefings, no winks or nudges, from any of the scores of people who must have been involved in the preparation, analysis, decision-making and execution of the operation. Even when Israelis now offer a firm no comment, it is strictly off the record. The secrecy is itself significant.
Israel is a small country. In some respects, it resembles an extended, if chaotic, family. Word gets around fast. Israelis have lived on the edge for so long they have become addicted to the news. Israels media is far too robust and its politicians far too leaky to allow secrets to remain secret for long. Even in the face of an increasingly archaic military censor, Israeli journalists have found ways to publish and, if necessary, be damned.
The only conceivable explanation for this unprecedented silence is that the event was so huge, and the implications for Israeli national security so great, that no one has dared break the rule of omertà. The Arab world has remained conspicuously and significantly silent. So, too, have American officials, who might have been expected to ramp up the incident as proof of their warnings about the dangers of rogue states and WMDs. The opposite is true. George Bush stonewalled persistent questions at a press conference last week with the blunt statement: Im not going to comment on the matter. Meanwhile the Americans have carried on dealing with the North Koreans as if nothing has changed.
The Syrian response, when it eventually came, was more forthcoming but no more helpful. First out of the blocks was Syrias ambassador to the United Nations, Bashar Jaafari, who happily announced that nothing had been bombed in Syria and nothing had been damaged. One week later, Syrias Vice-President, Farouk a-Shara, agreed that there had, after all, been an attack on the Arab Centre for the Studies (sic) of Arid Zones and Dry Lands (ACSAD). Brandishing a photograph of the Arab League-run plant, he declared triumphantly: This is the picture, you can see it, and it proves that everything that was said about this attack was wrong. Well, perhaps not everything. The following day, ACSAD issued a statement denying that its centre had been targeted: Leaks in the Zionist media concerning this ACSAD station are total inventions and lies, it thundered, adding that a tour of the centre was being organised for the media.
On Monday, Syrias President, Bashar Assad, offered his first observations of the attack. The target, he told the BBC disingenuously, was an unused military building. And he followed that with vows to retaliate, maybe politically, maybe in other ways. Meanwhile, the Washington Post noted that the United States had accumulated a growing body of evidence over the past six months and particularly in the month leading up to the attack that North Korea was co-operating with Syria on developing a nuclear facility. The evidence, according to the paper, included dramatic satellite imagery that led some US officials to believe the facility could be used to produce material for nuclear weapons. Even within Americas intelligence community, access to that imagery was restricted to just a handful of individuals on the instructions of Americas National Security Adviser, Stephen Hadley.
Why are all sides so reluctant to clarify the details of this extraordinary event? In the Middle East, noted Bret Stephens, a senior editorial executive at the Wall Street Journal and an acute observer of the region, that only happens when the interests of prudence and the demands of shame happen to coincide. He suggested that the least unlikely explanation is a partial reprise of the Israeli air strike which destroyed Iraqs Osirak nuclear reactor in 1981. Another of the least unlikely possibilities is that Syria was planning to supply its terrorist clients with dirty bombs, which would have threatened major cities through¬out the world. Terrorism is a growth industry in Syria and it is only natural that, emboldened by its Iranian ally, the Syrian regime should seek to remain the market leader by supplying the ultimate weapon to Hezbollah, Hamas and a plethora of Palestinian rejectionist groups who have been given house-room in Damascus.
The Syrians have good reason to up the ante now. The Alawite regime of Bashar Assad is facing a slew of tough questions in the coming months most particularly over its alleged role in the murder of the former Lebanese leader, Rafiq Hariri, and its active support for the insurgency in Iraq. Either of these issues could threaten the survival of the regime. How tempting, then, to create a counter-threat that might cause Washington and others to pull their horns in and perhaps even permit a limited Syrian return to Lebanon?
But that does not explain why the consignment was apparently too large to be sent by air. Look deeper and you find an array of other highly plausible explanations. The North Koreans, under intense international pressure, might have chosen to park a significant stockpile of nuclear material in Syria in the expectation of retrieving it when the heat was off. They might also have outsourced part of their nuclear development programme paying the Syrians to enrich their uranium while an international team of experts continued inspecting and disabling North Koreas own nuclear facilities. The shipment might even and this is well within the least unlikely explanations have been intended to assist Syrias own nuclear weapons programme, which has been on the cards since the mid-1980s.
Apart from averting the threat that was developing at Dayr as Zawr, Israels strategic position has been strengthened by the raid. Firstly, it has as Major General Amos Yadlin, the head of Israels military intelligence, noted restored its deterrence, which was damaged by its inept handling of the war in the Lebanon last year. Secondly, it has reminded Damascus that Israel knows what it is up to and is capable of striking anywhere within its territory. Equally, Iran has been put on notice that Israel will not tolerate any nuclear threat. Washington, too, has been reminded that Israels intelligence is often a better guide than its own in the region, a crucial point given the divisions between the Israeli and American intelligence assessments about the development of the Iranian bomb. Hezbollah, the Iranian/Syrian proxy force, has also been put on notice that the air-defence system it boasted would alter the strategic balance in the region is impotent in the face of Israeli technology.
Meanwhile, a senior Israeli analyst told us this week that the most disturbing aspect of the affair from a global perspective is the willingness of states to share their technologies and their weapons of mass destruction. I do not believe that the former Soviet Union shared its WMD technology, he said. And they were careful to limit the range of the Scud missiles they were prepared to sell. Since the end of the Cold War, though, we know the Russians significantly exceeded those limits when selling missile technology to Iran.
But the floodgates were opened wide by the renegade Pakistan nuclear scientist Abdul Qadeer Khan, who is revered in Pakistan as the Father of the Islamic Bomb. Khan established a virtual supermarket of nuclear technologies, parts and plans which operated for more than a decade on a global stage. After his operation was shut down in 2004, Khan admitted transferring technology and parts to Iran, Libya and North Korea. Proliferation experts are convinced they know the identities of at least three of his many other clients: Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Syria.
In addition to selling nuclear-related knowhow, the Khan network is also believed to have provided Syria with centrifuges for producing enriched uranium. In 2003, concern about Syrias nuclear ambitions was heightened when an experimental American electronic eavesdropping device picked up distinctive signals indicating that the Syrians had not only acquired the centrifuges but were actually operating them. If Israels military strike on Dayr as Zawr last month was surgical, so, too, was its handling of the aftermath. The only certainty in the fog of cover-up is that something big happened on 6 September something very big. At the very least, it illustrates that WMD and rogue states pose the single greatest threat to world peace. We may have escaped from this incident without war, but if Iran is allowed to continue down the nuclear path, it is hard to believe that we will be so lucky again.
Douglas Davis is a former senior editor of the Jerusalem Post and James Forsyth is online editor of The Spectator.
Plutonium is highly combustible. Turn it into plutonium-oxide soot drifting through the air, and it is no longer usable for bomb making
F-15 I (letter I as in Israeli variant of the regular US F-15 fighter)
World War III ??? A World War is a catasrophic series of escalating events culminating in massive military mobilizations and subsequent death and destruction. If Syria/Iran were to set off a nuke device in Israel we would wipe their miniscule presence off the face of the earth in a matter of minutes...Game Over - would that be WW III?
...
Another brush with WW III was when the Mad Bomber of Kosovo ordered the British to attack the Russians at Pristina Airport and then took out the Chinese embassy.”
That was a scary time with old Wesley Clark, the bright one, in charge lead by Slick. And together they blew up the Christians in their “perfect war”.
It depends on what happens next, of course. Who does Israel hit, besides Syria? Does Iran then pop in with its own nukes, directed at its various enemies?
And what does, say, Egypt do? Turkey?
I can’t imagine that the consequences would be that an exchange between Israel and Syria would result in nothing — the Israelis would undoubtedly hit other targets as well, if only to pre-empt.
Everything you state is possible.
That said, I still think the headline about just missing WWIII is ridiculous based on the participants alone.
who says there isn't?
What the really funny part of this is the fact that the engineers, technicians and support staff may have been killed.
You really can't just pull a tech or an engineer off the shelf.
ahhh, so funny. (wiping tear from eyes)... I've said it once before, but I repeat. " I would pay money to be a fly on the wall in the after action report."
ROTFLMAO
That’s the F-15 EYE the I is the Israeli varient.
Different electronics package...
There is another reason for this strike force bombing. To let them know where the line is that they should not cross.
So they used the same code of the day as we were. The transponders must be switched off after everybody knows each other. The swept freq, power, pulses, wavelengths that are ECM would blind the transponder anyway. Only a handful of people know what the code is. This was a successful operation. I give it five ***** for secrecy.
ping for later read
“Infact its closer to Iraq than it is to Turkey.
Anyone have a bead on where the target area actaully was?”
That was my thought. Dayr as Zawr (As Suwar) is also on the road to Mosul. What if Iraq was going to be the actual target?
It’s kind of hard to have a “fun” discussion of Electronic Warfare in an unclassified environment. Although I have been out for 14 years I get a little nervous about describing exactly what techniques were used against me, what effect it had on my equipment, why it was or was not successful.
The best unclassified book I ever read about the subject was called, “The Enemy is Listening” written by Aileen Clayton who was a German linguist and intercept operator during WWII. She covers a lot so subjects outside of that specific field that are very interesting and the foundation of everything else that happened in the field since.
I am still fascinated by the subject and enjoy trying to read between the lines.
Having your radar system suddenly go “dark” is in itself a warning of impending attack. To have your radar defenses hacked and manipulated, keeps you in the warm fuzzy zone (that all is well). By the time you learn of the raid, the attackers are gone, and you are left wondering just what happened. Sounds like a great weapons system.
Thanks for the ping. BMFLR.
That's some cool trivia.
Curious that no one has connected this dot.
Southack has connected that dot...
FYI, there have been at least two nuclear weapons used in combat since WW2. During the Sino-Soviet border wars (WW2-1993) had two events recorded on seismographs in the West that could only have been large tactical nukes or small strategic ones.
***First I’ve heard of this. The first nuclear exchange came with a whimper rather than a bang.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.