Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TitansAFC
I have voted pro life in every election since 1976.
I will vote for the candidate that can beat Hillary. Anything else is only going to advance the abortionist cause. Do not make perfect the enemy of the good.

I have given money for 20 years to Dobson et al. It will stop if this foolishness continues.

I will hold my nose if I have to and save as many babies as possible. Not turn the government over to the evil left.

7 posted on 10/04/2007 9:49:48 AM PDT by Bainbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Bainbridge
"I will hold my nose if I have to and save as many babies as possible."

Care to explain how that works because I certainly don't understand how voting pro-abortion whether R or D saves any babies?

43 posted on 10/04/2007 10:08:10 AM PDT by penowa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Bainbridge
Sad. Very.

BTW, Is THIS political drek your FIRST CHOICE?

He is squirming constantly and misrepresenting his Hillary-like views on Guns, Abortion, Sanctuary, Federalizing Education, Feminizing the Military, Global UN Control, and oh, yeah, the NAU and NAFTA Superhighway...

I have already decided. I am not voting for him. Not I "don't think I'll vote for him."

I won't.

No more "lesser of two evils."

That is just evil in and of itself. And those who wish to foist evil on us, as the 'lesser' are just accomplices to evil.

Don't be such an accomplice. Now is when and where you can make a difference. Support the bona fide conservatives.

HELP US. DON'T DESERT CONSERVATISM. STAND FOR SOMETHING!

Show some back-bone.

56 posted on 10/04/2007 10:14:24 AM PDT by Paul Ross (Ronald Reagan-1987:"We are always willing to be trade partners but never trade patsies.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Bainbridge
I will hold my nose if I have to and save as many babies as possible.

Voting for someone that supports the slaughter of the unborn and the homosexual agenda is not only sinful, but STUPID.

If the Republicans abandon the pro-life position -- which they will be doing if Giuliani is elected -- the pro-life movement is essentially dead in both parties.

Get a brain.

72 posted on 10/04/2007 10:20:00 AM PDT by Ol' Sparky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Bainbridge
I will hold my nose if I have to and save as many babies as possible. Not turn the government over to the evil left.

If the choice is between two pro abortion candidates for president, why would you make the choice that effectively destroys the prolife movement in the Republican Party? How will that save any babies?

104 posted on 10/04/2007 10:29:57 AM PDT by ElkGroveDan (Take the wheel, Fred.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Bainbridge

I agree with you Bainbridge.


145 posted on 10/04/2007 10:53:38 AM PDT by spyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Bainbridge
I will hold my nose if I have to and save as many babies as possible. Not turn the government over to the evil left.

Then you may be voting for a pro abortion socialist in the GOP instead of a pro abortion socialist in the Democrat party.
198 posted on 10/04/2007 11:40:42 AM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Bainbridge

We played that game out here in California with Arnold and have been sorely disappointed. In hindsight, I wished I’d voted my heart for McClintock and risked the valley that Cruz Bustamante would have given us. Now it’s a slow death and the GOP in California will never survive. I will not vote for Rudy. More babies will be saved in the long term if the people are so sickened by a Hillary presidency that they will never vote Democrat or a RINO again.


428 posted on 10/04/2007 8:38:39 PM PDT by Rockitz (This isn't rocket science- Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Bainbridge

Then you must have voted for Lester Maddox for President in 1976, right? He was the American Party nominee.


447 posted on 10/05/2007 7:32:25 AM PDT by Theodore R. ( Cowardice is still forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Bainbridge
Bully for you. I too would like the perfect candidate but I know that I can’t win the Primary (big grin). Dr. Dobson is demonstrating that it is his ego that is important and NOT the issues of saving the lives of the unborn or the biblical definition of marriage. In elections such a this we must take partial victories. In good conscience we must vote for the individuals that would cause the least harm. If that be Giuliani, then so be it; Hillary is the worst of all possible worlds. Dobson and others like him must put their so-called principles aside and recognize the realities of the real politic. A Republican in the White House, no matter how flawed, is the ONLY way to insure some protection of conservative values.
507 posted on 10/08/2007 11:42:19 AM PDT by francesco525
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Bainbridge
I will vote for the candidate that can beat Hillary.

Thank you. If Dobson and his followers get their wish it will be disastrous.

518 posted on 10/09/2007 6:08:13 AM PDT by 6ppc (It's torch and pitchfork time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Bainbridge

Rudy is part of the evil left. He’ll be another Arnold Schwarzenegger. What makes you think he is a conservative?

For that matter, when the real campaign gets going, what makes people think Rudy can win? I can just see him getting a phone call from his wife in the middle of a big speech while on the campaign trail.

Rudy is a leftist and a loon... or is that redundant?


538 posted on 10/09/2007 8:00:22 AM PDT by Pining_4_TX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson