27% of Republicans Would Vote for Pro-Life Third Party Instead of Giuliani (Proof Rudy CAN'T Win)

Rasmussen Reports ^ | 10-4-07 | Rasmussen Reports

[gathersnomoss]

Clinton II. You get what you vote for.

[calcowgirl]

15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.

They've almost completed that objective, as evidenced on this thread.

[calcowgirl]

“ Save me Rooty, my principles have long disappeared. Only YOU Rooty, can keep me from the burkha by sending out those social conservatives that you so despise to fight the WOT, so that people like me, living in my gated community, can continue to shop at the finest stores!"

gag me kind of thing.

I'm definitely suffering from that gag thing. ;-)

[cajungirl]

You know it is starting to make me dislike the pro lifers. Really. They would put a woman in the WH that would change the course of this country in ways they cannot even imagine.

They have controlled this board, demeaned anyone who disagreed with them, have done nothing but threaten to take their ball to a new field if they don’t get their way.

These third party people won’t nominate someone who would do anything other than deliver the WH to an evil evil woman.

[TitansAFC]

-—”Clinton II. You get what you vote for.”-—

You just don’t get it. WHO CARES if Clinton wins in a Hitlery vs. Rudy911 race? The threat is empty to me.

You just don’t get the fact that a GOP run by Rudy911 is not a GOP worth supporting anymore. It is a radically different party working against my values and issues.

Clinton II would be BETTER to me than Rudy911. At least THEN the Liberal GOPers will get the DAMNED idea through their head that you can’t win with a Liberal running the party. At least THEN we’d have a party left to fight for, something we would NOT have with Rudy911 at the helm. At least THEN we won’t have to witness a permanent splitting of the party, and a GOP seeking NARAL endorsements every election.

[calcowgirl]

Liberals within are more destructive than those who you can face and oppose openly and vehemently.

If you believed your tagline, you would not be calling conservatives “arrogant,” “stupid,” and “useful idiots”... IMO.

[Conservativegreatgrandma]

Pro-Life advocates are not idiots, there will be no third party created by them.

I'm afraid you're wrong. Ever heard of the Constitution Party? The problem is they're just as flawed as Republicans but the "purists" have been hoodwinked into believing they're more pure.

This is downright scarry. We must remain united to defeat Hillary.

[calcowgirl]

Your "less strident one" will appoint people to the RNC and it's powerful committees -- liberal country club Republicans. Your "less strident one" will result in the prolife plank being stripped from the party platform -- effectively killing the GOP in future national elections.

Rudy = Schwarzenegger--on a national scale.

[Mariner]

I would prefer FDT, but I don’t think he’ll win.

[Ol' Sparky]

. And then when Hilary takes over talk radio and makes your taxes subsidize the late term abortions that her Supreme court nominees uphold and the “partnership “ benefits for the sodomites you can take full credit for not having voted for Giuliani but for actually effectively voting for HIllary.

None of those things would happen if Hillary took over. Republicans would filibuster all legislation involving the issues you mentioned.

And, you don't SEEM TO REALIZE Giuliani is for domestic partnership benefits and civil unions for sodomites, has opposed a ban on PBA and has supported taxpayer funding of abortion. GET YOUR HEAD OUT OF BEHIND AND LEARN HOW LIBERAL GIULIANI IS.

There is a FAR better chance of civil unions and taxpayer funded abortions becoming reality if Giuliani works with Democrats and RINOs to get all that passed.

It's just amazing you can't comprehend that.

[OESY]

Ross Perot made the Clinton presidency of either 8 or 16 years possible, got Ginsburg and Breyer appointed to the Supreme Court, encouraged al Qaeda by its weakness in foreign affairs, sent sensitive missile technology to the Chinese in return for campaign cash, and ran what was (not arguably) the most corrupt administration in the history of this Republic. Did you enable Perot for the sake of "principle"? If so, you also bear responsibility for the impending disaster that confronts the United States. Sometimes street smarts are required to avoid shooting yourself and your principles in the foot.

.

[Ol' Sparky]

But it is fact that Hillary Clinton would not appoint any judge willing to overturn Roe V. Wade.

Guiliani has spoken before NARAL, opposed a ban on PBA and has and still does support taxpayer funding of abortion.

Given that, why on earth would you think he'd appoint a justice willing to overturn Roe?

[afnamvet]

read later

[Ol' Sparky]

So, in order “show the GOP who’s boss”, you’ll allow a more-liberal-than-Guliani to be elected?

You got the wrong poster here. I rather see Hillary in office than Giuliani. She would do less damage to conservatism.

[WhistlingPastTheGraveyard]

Social conservative are not and have never been reliable GOP voters.

Then you have nothing to worry about.

[roses of sharon]

Oops, I think you posted to the wrong person, I have no idea which candidate you are talking about?

I scrolled back and don’t see which one?

Come again please, thanks!

[Ol' Sparky]

Once she’s in she is there for 8 years. Who knows how long this Republic would last..

The Republic survived just fine when Bill Clinton was in office. Republicans gained 500 seats nationwide, took over Congress and we got a balanced budget and welfare reform.

What the Republic might not survive is Giuliani Presidency that would cripple the conservative movement and shrink the Republican minority in Congress. It would at least a decade before Republicans would even have a chance of controlling congress again and eight years before a conservative President could assume office.

[Designer]

"They would put a woman in the WH that would change the course of this country.."

I'm sure they don't intend to do that at all, and I can see if we put two and two together, we could project that as one possible scenario.

However, if you look at it from a different angle, namely; put pressure on the Republican leadership to dump Rudy and any other pro-death candidate, then everybody wins!

A pro-life POTUS in the WH, a re-energized GOP, and the dummycrats in fast retreat.

I see that as a win-win-win.

Just dump Rudy. It's a start.

[Designer]

"..if Rudy gets the nomination.."

Please see my post #398.

[Designer]

"Anti-Semite"

Huh? Whodat? I didn't know there was an anti-Semite candidate in the race.