Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GeorgefromGeorgia; xzins; rhombus; P-Marlowe
The “I will never vote for Rudy” folks would have had a problem voting for Nixon over McGovern in 72. . . . Nixon was more liberal than Rudy. McGovern look a lot like Hildebeast, except that McGovern was honest.

Uh can you show us where Nixon EVER promoted militant homosexualism, abortion, infringement of Second Amendment rights, illegal aliens? Not only is Rooty Toot more liberal than Nixon, except for the war he's more liberal than McGovern was back in 1972.

Whoever came up with this absurd idea that the GOP could win by running a candidate more liberal than most 'Rats is insane!

79 posted on 10/04/2007 1:27:37 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]


To: wagglebee; GeorgefromGeorgia; xzins; rhombus; P-Marlowe

Our reason for rejecting Rudy is not stubborn obstinance. Life is one of the deepest most heart-held, sacred principles that we hold before Almighty God, and the violation of it would make us accountable to God.

I hope the Giuliani supporters see that their candidate will never win, and that a Giuliani nomination equals a Hillary victory.

“If you will join in murdering your neighbor, then we can win the Presidency.”

I think not.


82 posted on 10/04/2007 2:04:23 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain And Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
Uh can you show us where Nixon EVER promoted militant homosexualism, abortion, infringement of Second Amendment rights, illegal aliens?

Your request is quite odd. Why would I expect them to have said anything about issues that are 40 years in the future? Do any of the current candidates have position papers on the burning issues of 2047?

BTW, on the vast majority of issues, I would rate Rudy more liberal than Nixon.

85 posted on 10/04/2007 2:21:32 PM PDT by CommerceComet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
Whoever came up with this absurd idea that the GOP could win by running a candidate more liberal than most 'Rats is insane!

I think it's more of that socialist virus that tells us we have to make everything homogenous and so leave us devoid of meaningful choices -- we can't have a minority promoting excellence that sticks out like a sore thumb!

90 posted on 10/04/2007 2:43:56 PM PDT by Terriergal ("I am ashamed that women are so simple To offer war where they should kneel for peace," Shakespeare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

NIXON put more liberal on the Supreme Court than Rudy will. Nixon MAY have been a bit more conservative on social issues (of course he was President almost 40 years ago). Rudy is far more conservative on issue that really matter to a Presidency. Issues like Defense, Homeland Security, Taxation.


132 posted on 10/05/2007 6:48:37 AM PDT by GeorgefromGeorgia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson