NIXON put more liberal on the Supreme Court than Rudy will. Nixon MAY have been a bit more conservative on social issues (of course he was President almost 40 years ago). Rudy is far more conservative on issue that really matter to a Presidency. Issues like Defense, Homeland Security, Taxation.
Nixon didn't know they were liberals. And we have NO REASON to believe that Rooty Toot would appoint anything other than liberals; after all, why would any president knowingly appoint judges with views that were the exact opposite of their own.
Nixon MAY have been a bit more conservative on social issues (of course he was President almost 40 years ago).
Out comes the moral relativism. LIFE is every bit as important today as it was 40 or 400 or 4000 years ago. Moral relativists like yourself seem to think that moral principles can change based on convenience, they don't.
Rudy is far more conservative on issue that really matter to a Presidency. Issues like Defense, Homeland Security, Taxation.
First of all, there is no evidence of this. I have yet to see where Rooty Toot plans to lower taxes. And defense is neither a conservative nor liberal issue (the fact that most conservatives support the war and most liberals oppose it notwithstanding). Moreoever, all of the major Democrat candidates are now on record saying that they will continue to fight the war, so that issue is now off the table for Rooty Toot.
More Americans have died in abortuaries THIS WEEK than have died in the war on terror, why is it that you don't think THEY are important?