“Rasmussen screens for Likely Primary Voters while others do not”
Well, that explains the weird differences in the polls!
Rasmussen does it right.
I wonder if people would vote for a Thompson-Giuliani ticket? I think that would be pretty strong, myself.
And just who decides the GOP elections? The moderates and leftists in the party - the Rockefeller Republicans, the Council on Foreign Relations - CERTAINLY not the conservatives! Look where the two most conservative candidates are in this race. ONLY THE MOST MODERATE OR LEFTIST in the GOP ARE THE FRONTRUNNERS!!!
WAKE UP AMERICA!!!
Fred’s Rasmussen numbers don’t look that encouraging. No one else’s numbers do either.
There’s the link to recent Rasmussen numbers. I don’t know how to explain it. I expected Fred’s entry to change the numbers more, and put McCain in single digits or out entirely.
Thank God! Go Thompson/Hunter or Hunter/Thompson, NO RUDY!
I see here: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1906105/posts
that Fred is backing ethanol subsidies in a glutted market.
I think that the Republican Women’s Clubs just picked Giuliani at their meeting in Palm Springs, last week.
Actually the situation is even more favorable for Fred than the Rasmussen polling indicates, as the states which gave Bush their electoral votes in 2004 (the Red States) will be over represented at the GOP convention as convention rules give about a 20% advantage to the states which voted Republican in the last election. So, while Bush received 53% of the electoral votes, those states will send 64% of the delegates to the convention, and most of those delegates will be from the Sun Belt south and the Rockies, which is Fred territory. So Rudy and Mitt may poll well in the NE but the Blue states will only be sending 36% of the delegates to the convention.