Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chertoff Defends Border Fence
Associated Press through Breitbart ^ | October 1, 2007 | Eileen Sullivan

Posted on 10/02/2007 7:48:19 PM PDT by yorkie

WASHINGTON (AP) - Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff on Monday defended the construction of a fence along the southwest border, saying it's actually better for the environment than what happens when people illegally cross the U.S.-Mexico line. "Illegal migrants really degrade the environment. I've seen pictures of human waste, garbage, discarded bottles and other human artifact in pristine areas," Chertoff said in a telephone interview with The Associated Press. "And believe me, that is the worst thing you can do to the environment."

To curb illegal immigration, the U.S. government plans to complete 370 miles of fencing and put 200 miles of vehicle barriers on the southwest border by the end of 2008. But this has brought complaints that the fence and barriers are harmful to the environment.

Chertoff said the department exceeded its goal to complete 150 miles of fencing along the Mexican border by the end of the 2007 fiscal year, which was Sunday.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aliens; border; fence; immigrantlist; immigration
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 10/02/2007 7:48:22 PM PDT by yorkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yorkie

Do they think we have amnesia? How stupid do they assume that we are?


2 posted on 10/02/2007 7:49:51 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (https://www.fred08.com/contribute.aspx?RefererID=c637caaa-315c-4b4c-9967-08d864cd0791)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Yes and very.


3 posted on 10/02/2007 7:53:16 PM PDT by Whispering Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yorkie
So this moronic rodent has emerged from his bung hole again? Yawn. I’d have greater confidence if Mr. Roberts were in charge of “homeland security”. And, what wanker thought up that title?
4 posted on 10/02/2007 7:54:12 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Elections have consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yorkie

Bush defend the border?

Not in this term.


5 posted on 10/02/2007 8:05:03 PM PDT by Mark was here (Hard work never killed anyone, but why take the chance?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham

It sickens me when idiots like Jerkhoff think they have to justify national security as being “environmentally friendly.” Hey! How about some “environmentally friendly” guard towers, machine guns, barbed wire, land mines, and angry groin-biting dogs?


6 posted on 10/02/2007 8:07:03 PM PDT by henkster (The dems have reserved your place on the collective farm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: yorkie

“Illegal migrants really degrade the environment. I’ve seen pictures of human waste, garbage, discarded bottles and other human artifact in pristine areas,” Chertoff said in a telephone interview with The Associated Press. “And believe me, that is the worst thing you can do to the environment.”

Egad, who put this imbicile in charge of home security? He thinks that leaving a human turd is the worst thing you could do to the environment. The terrorists are probably rolling around on the floor with laughter.

GW please do something right and replace this clown with someone more competent and who is not just a “yes man” to you.


7 posted on 10/02/2007 8:08:37 PM PDT by 353FMG (Government is the opiate of the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yorkie

Huh?

Wasn’t he the one insisting illegal immigration is A GOOD THING not two months ago?

Loudly?


8 posted on 10/02/2007 8:09:13 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yorkie
To curb illegal immigration, the U.S. government plans to complete 370 miles of fencing and put 200 miles of vehicle barriers on the southwest border by the end of 2008. But this has brought complaints that the fence and barriers are harmful to the environment.

It could be built in months if they were serious

Any pictures of what it looks like and will it be effective
9 posted on 10/02/2007 8:11:29 PM PDT by uncbob (m first)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG

San Diego, still has a big hole in gopher canyon area with no fence.. I think this Chertoff thinks we are all stupid.. The last I heard from Duncan Hunter was about 60miles of fence..


10 posted on 10/02/2007 8:11:52 PM PDT by JoanneSD (Illegals represented without taxation.. Citizens taxed without representation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: henkster; TigersEye
Hey! How about some “environmentally friendly” guard towers, machine guns, barbed wire, land mines, and angry groin-biting dogs?

They could take Vick's pitbulls for a start. I don't really care what they need to do as long as that fence goes up. The wild animals will have to adapt to living on one side of the fence or the other. I prefer keeping illegals & terrorists out. Barb wire, guard towers & dogs are fine with me.

11 posted on 10/02/2007 8:12:48 PM PDT by pandoraou812 ( zero tolerance to the will of Allah & Muslims ...... dilligaf? with an efg.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: uncbob

“It could be built in months if they were serious..”

Give the job to Halliburton and it will be done right and fast.


12 posted on 10/02/2007 8:15:41 PM PDT by 353FMG (Government is the opiate of the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: yorkie

” human waste, garbage, discarded bottles and other “

geez, sounds just like the description my husband gave today of laborers of mexican decent, that are working on his UNION job and how disgusted he is that they leave their human, or in their case for doing so - subhuman-, waste upon the job site.......


13 posted on 10/02/2007 8:16:08 PM PDT by tina07 (In loving memory of my father,WWII Vet. CBI 10/16/42 - 12/17/45, d. 11/1/85)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: henkster

Don’t forget the flame throwers!


14 posted on 10/02/2007 8:20:18 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Elections have consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: yorkie
Chertoff should be chained somewhere so decent folk could go and poke him with sticks. His nitwit comments would just be pathetic if he wasn’t in a position where he can do so much damage. He really shouln’t be allowed out without supervision; much less allowed to hold any position involving the slightest responsibility. He’s not even smart enough to be a carnival geek.
15 posted on 10/02/2007 8:23:08 PM PDT by isrul (Lamentations 5:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yorkie

The Alaska Highway, all 1523 miles of it, was built in one year (1942-43) over some of the worst possible artic terrain in brutally cold winter and mosquito-infested summer. It was done with small trucks and primitive bulldozers.

Now we can’t build a lousy fence in a subtropical climate with modern technology.

Wasn’t this a great country?


16 posted on 10/02/2007 8:27:44 PM PDT by oldbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yorkie

Umm...I feel like I feel down the rabbit hole. Have to shake my head at “Chertoff” and “defends border fence” in the same headline.

he’s right that it’s better for the environment...I just wish I trusted the work being done.


17 posted on 10/02/2007 8:28:43 PM PDT by Soul Seeker (A government that’s big enough to do everything for us is powerful enough to do anything to us.- F.T)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yorkie

This is all getting a little confusing and I suspect it is because there are those who want it to be so. There was another thread about the Brownsville mayor filing a suit because of a 16 ft. fence that was to be built there. This article makes reference to so much fence and then the rest are vehicle barriers.

That is not my understanding of the law. The law as I understand it provides for double fence with a patrol road in between and states the geographical locations and ports of entry in no uncertain terms. So what gives?


18 posted on 10/02/2007 8:29:35 PM PDT by WildcatClan (Duncan Hunter '08 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yorkie

Is this from The Onion?


19 posted on 10/02/2007 8:35:36 PM PDT by Redbob (WWJBD - "What Would Jack Bauer Do?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldbill

We didn’t have “environmental impact statements” , the EPA, and the environuts in those days


20 posted on 10/02/2007 10:00:59 PM PDT by kaktuskid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson