Pro life schmo life..who cares?, this is not an important issue in presidential politics. Rudy has already stated he will appoint constructionists to the USSC so relax. Remember we had 12 continuous years of pro life administrations {1980-92} and did abortion on demand go away? NO!, we had a pro life president , and pro life {GOP} congress...but we still have abortions do we not?
We need to concentrate on the real Issues like the WOT, and Rudy is one of the few candidates that will take this legitimate issue to heart.
You are full of BS. A new Rooty Toot. Go away!
And I can’t think of a real pro-life candidate who would not also be firm in the war on terror. I want someone strong on both, and will not vote for liberal Rudy to get one of the two. That’s simple to understand.
If Rudy has been around this long and is working this hard to convince us that he is pro-life, then he isn’t. I hear the talk about Rudy being big in the war on terror, but what has he said or done that Fred Thompson or any other pro-lifer has not said or done? It just seems to me that some simply want the GOP to be pr-abortion.
That line only works on complete morons and jooty - which one are you?
You're on the wrong website son.
Go peddle your liberal tripe somewhere else.
Btw, I see Ozone and Viking Kittens in your immediate future 'jimmy'.
that does NOT make him an expert on the WOT.
That and he would not even let me defend myself against radical islam as he prepares to take my guns away.....
Given that Giuliani appointed liberal judges by an 8-1 margin in New York and has tried to redefine what a strict constructionalist is by stating one could vote to uphold Roe, there is absolutely no reason to believe, especially since his election would cause a shrinking minority in the Senate, that he will appoint anything but David Souter-type of justices.
It's impossible for conservatism to succeed when conservatives are voting for liberals.
Gee, ya think that was because a RINO like Bush 41 helped put David Souter on the Supreme Court? Or because Democrats controlled congress and Reagan had to settle for Sandra Day O'Connor and Anthony Kennedy>
Well, Rudy is a bigger RINO than Bush 41 and a Giuliani Presidency will result in Republicans being a crippled minority in that Senate that will allow the Democrats to effectively choose who sits on SCOTUS.
All the GOP candidates take this issue seriously except for Ron Paul. We don’t need Rudy to lead that fight. We actually need Rudy to take a hike and all his social issues with him.