Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

High Court won't hear church-state cases
CBS News ^ | October 1, 2007

Posted on 10/01/2007 1:21:03 PM PDT by processing please hold

(CBS/AP) The Supreme Court opened its new term Monday refusing to get involved in two church-state disputes - one over religious organizations paying for workers' birth-control health insurance benefits, the other over an evangelical group's plea to hold religious services at a public library.

The birth-control benefits dispute was triggered by a New York state law that forces religious-based social service agencies to subsidize contraceptives as part of prescription drug coverage they offer employees.

New York is one of 23 states that require employers offering prescription benefits to employees to cover birth control pills as well, the groups say. The state enacted the Women's Health and Wellness Act in 2002 to require health plans to cover contraception and other services aimed at women, including mammography, cervical cancer screenings and bone density exams.

Catholic Charities and other religious groups argued that New York's law violates their First Amendment right to practice their religion because it forces them to violate religious teachings that regard contraception as sinful.

"If the state can compel church entities to subsidize contraceptives in violation of their religious beliefs, it can compel them to subsidize abortions as well," the groups said in urging the court to take their case. "And if it can compel church entities to subsidize abortions, it can require hospitals owned by churches to provide them."

Other Catholic and Baptist organizations are part of the lawsuit. Seventh-Day Adventist and Orthodox Jewish groups signed onto a brief filed in support of Catholic Charities.

In the library case, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco had ruled that public libraries can block religious groups like the Faith Center Church Evangelistic Ministries from worshipping in public meeting rooms.

The Contra Costa library system in the San Francisco Bay area allows groups to use its facilities for educational, cultural and community-related programs.

"Although religious worship is an important institution in any community, we disagree that anything remotely community-related must therefore be granted access to the Antioch Library meeting room," the appeals court concluded in a 2-1 decision.

Allowing worship services would amount to having taxpayers subsidize religious exercises, argued the Contra Costa County, Calif., Library Board, which operated the facility in Antioch, Calif.

In the dispute over making religious organizations subsidize contraceptives, the court rejected a challenge to a similar law in California.

"A church ought to be able to run its affairs and organize relationships with its employees in a way that's consistent with moral values and teachings," said Kevin Baine, a partner at the Williams and Connolly law firm who represents the religious organizations.

The New York law contains an exemption for churches, seminaries and other institutions with a mainly religious mission that primarily serve followers of that religion. Catholic Charities and the other groups sought the exemption, but they hire and serve people of different faiths.

New York's highest court ruled last year that the groups had to comply with the law. The 6-0 decision by the state Court of Appeals hinged on the determination that the groups are essentially social service agencies, not churches.

According to Planned Parenthood, the other states with similar laws are: Arizona, Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Missouri, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington and West Virginia.

The birth-control benefits case is Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Albany v. Dinallo, 06-1550. The library case is Faith Center Church v. Glover, 06-1633.


TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: antichristian; christophobes; persecution; wallofseparation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-155 next last

1 posted on 10/01/2007 1:21:08 PM PDT by processing please hold
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: processing please hold

And the persecution of Christianity continues . . .


2 posted on 10/01/2007 1:23:27 PM PDT by ConorMacNessa (HM/2 USN, 3rd Bn. 5th Marines, RVN 1969. St. Michael the Archangel defend us in battle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConorMacNessa
And the persecution of Christianity continues . . .

SSDD

3 posted on 10/01/2007 1:24:56 PM PDT by processing please hold (Duncan Hunter '08) (ROP and Open Borders-a terrorist marriage and hell's coming with them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: processing please hold
High Court won't hear church-state cases

So much for that drivel from liberals about Dubya turning America
into a Fundamentalist Christian Theocracy.
4 posted on 10/01/2007 1:26:39 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VOA
So much for that drivel from liberals about Dubya turning America into a Fundamentalist Christian Theocracy.

This won't stop them from saying it. They've gone over the edge - mentally.

5 posted on 10/01/2007 1:29:20 PM PDT by processing please hold (Duncan Hunter '08) (ROP and Open Borders-a terrorist marriage and hell's coming with them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: processing please hold

Hmmm....and what will the reaction be when the same law is forced upon Islam.....?


6 posted on 10/01/2007 1:32:21 PM PDT by cbkaty (I may not always post...but I am always here......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: processing please hold
And yet that same library in S.F. will hold a gay rights book study or a global warming action group. In todays world activism and religion is one in the same to most of the left.
7 posted on 10/01/2007 1:33:06 PM PDT by Abathar (Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cbkaty
Hmmm....and what will the reaction be when the same law is forced upon Islam.....?

I'm looking into that now.

8 posted on 10/01/2007 1:34:24 PM PDT by processing please hold (Duncan Hunter '08) (ROP and Open Borders-a terrorist marriage and hell's coming with them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: processing please hold

The solution seems to be to get rid of the wellness act all together. People are responsible for their own health care. Second, the church should find a private residence to hold worship service or fellowship. Tax dollars and churches don’t mix. They don’t pay for the library so they, as a church, don’t get to use it.

Persecution of christians???? That is quite a reach. Certainly there are plenty of christians who liked the outcome of that vote.


9 posted on 10/01/2007 1:34:45 PM PDT by DaveBuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar
And yet that same library in S.F. will hold a gay rights book study or a global warming action group. In todays world activism and religion is one in the same to most of the left.

Lord have mercy.

Fags and phony global warming are welcome but Christians are not. What a world what a world.

10 posted on 10/01/2007 1:38:00 PM PDT by processing please hold (Duncan Hunter '08) (ROP and Open Borders-a terrorist marriage and hell's coming with them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: processing please hold

How many justices have to agree to hear a case????

I would think there are four who would agree to hear those cases, but what do I know???


11 posted on 10/01/2007 1:38:18 PM PDT by savedbygrace (SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation; narses; SMEDLEYBUTLER; redhead; Notwithstanding; nickcarraway; Romulus; ...
Catholic Ping
Please freepmail me if you want on/off this list


12 posted on 10/01/2007 1:40:39 PM PDT by NYer ("Where the bishop is present, there is the Catholic Church" - Ignatius of Antioch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: processing please hold

Isn’t there a Catholic majority in the SCOTUS? This is just stunning.


13 posted on 10/01/2007 1:41:52 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaveBuck

Agreed. It seems a bit of a stretch to say “If they won’t come to our Church to hear us, they might come to the library to hear us”. Having said that, however- if the church doesn’t get to use the library, neither should any other meeting-group.


14 posted on 10/01/2007 1:45:22 PM PDT by richmwill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: processing please hold

So much for the Conservative Supreme court.

Aside from Scalia and Thomas and possibly Roberts and Alitto, its the same old liberal cant from the Ennead of Idiots.


15 posted on 10/01/2007 1:46:29 PM PDT by ZULU (Non nobis, non nobis Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaveBuck
They don’t pay for the library so they, as a church, don’t get to use it.

Do American Christian citizens pay taxes? Where do Libraries get the money to be built and stocked?

Certainly there are plenty of christians who liked the outcome of that vote.

Why would they like it?

16 posted on 10/01/2007 1:47:02 PM PDT by processing please hold (Duncan Hunter '08) (ROP and Open Borders-a terrorist marriage and hell's coming with them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: montag813
Isn’t there a Catholic majority in the SCOTUS? This is just stunning.

Sometimes the Court will refuse to hear a case because it is not "ripe." The issue might be better decided in a later case with differing circumstances.

17 posted on 10/01/2007 1:48:21 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: montag813
Isn’t there a Catholic majority in the SCOTUS? This is just stunning.

Maybe they decided to defer to the states and their elected representatives, rather than micromanaging local policy by legislating from the bench.

18 posted on 10/01/2007 1:48:46 PM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ZULU
So much for the Conservative Supreme court.

That very comment crossed my mind too when I read the article.

19 posted on 10/01/2007 1:48:48 PM PDT by processing please hold (Duncan Hunter '08) (ROP and Open Borders-a terrorist marriage and hell's coming with them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: processing please hold

Churches should stop providing insurance coverage.

Why do churches have employees anyway?

And, fifty years ago lots of Christians considered it to be a lack of faith in God to have health insurance. Ain’t that something to think about.


20 posted on 10/01/2007 1:55:18 PM PDT by donna (Equal justice for U.S. citizens!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-155 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson