Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Heather Mac Donald: Orlando Vacation from Reality - What Patterson got wrong.
National Review Online ^ | October 01, 2007 | Heather Mac Donald

Posted on 10/01/2007 10:26:05 AM PDT by neverdem







Orlando Vacation from Reality
What Patterson got wrong.

By Heather Mac Donald

The high incarceration rate of black males is not “solely the result of white racism,” wrote Harvard sociologist Orlando Patterson in the New York Times on Sunday. Patterson’s startling admission was occasioned by the media-saturated protests two weeks ago in Jena., Louisiana, over attempted murder charges lodged against five black students who had beaten a white student unconscious. This unusual outbreak of frankness on the pages of the New York Times might seem to signal a breakthrough in the otherwise nonexistent public debate over black crime.  Unfortunately, celebrations are not in order. While Patterson does manage to squeeze out some previously taboo truths about black criminality, he hedges those truths with so much politically correct boilerplate about a racist justice system as to almost entirely blunt their impact. His op-ed is as much a measure of the barriers to honesty as a release from them.

First the good news: Patterson’s oped declares that Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, and other leading Jena demonstrators are in a “state of denial” when they acknowledge only white racism as the reason for black imprisonment. It is a “simple fact that young black men commit a disproportionate number of crimes, especially violent crimes, which cannot be attributed to judicial bias, racism or economic hardships,” writes this sociologist of race. “The rate at which blacks commit homicides is seven times that of whites.” So far, so good.

As importantly, Patterson draws attention to black family breakdown. The “absence of fathers” and the 70-percent black illegitimacy rate are “undoubtedly a major cause of youth delinquency,” he says. Patterson attributes the disintegration of marriage to a “crisis in relations between [African-American] men and women,” above all to high rates of domestic violence and misogyny.

Had such observations stood alone, they might have provided enough of a shock to the status quo to start a more lasting debate about the toll of crime and illegitimacy on black communities. But before Patterson reaches them, he inoculates the reader from their significance with recycled myths about racism. Among Patterson’s untruths:

The “prison system [is] a means of controlling young black men.” This Foucault-inspired, academic theory-saturated bromide is utterly meaningless. The only “young black men” whom the prison system attempts to control are those who have committed crimes. Stay crime-free and you stay out of the courts and the jails. Graduate from college and you will find every elite institution courting you for the favor of your presence.

The fact that “blacks are incarcerated at over eight times the white rate” is a “racially biased . . . situation,” resulting in a “virtual gulag of racial incarceration,” Patterson intones. Again, this incendiary language has no evidence behind it. Such promiscuous charges are irresponsible since they only reinforce the self-defeating sense among black youth that the system is stacked against them. Patterson’s attempt to back up the “racial gulag” conceit only compounds the problem.


The “law enforcement system...unfairly focuses on drug offenses and other crimes more likely to be committed by blacks,” he says. This statement implies that there are significant categories of crimes less likely to be committed by blacks that are ignored by the law enforcement system. He offers no examples of such crimes, however, because there are none. In every category of major felony, be it violent crimes like rape, robbery, assault, and homicide, or property crimes like burglary and auto theft, blacks far outstrip whites and Asians in rates of commission. It is the (largely minority) victims of, and witnesses to, those crimes who report this imbalance, not the allegedly “racist” architects and administrators of the criminal-justice system. According to victim testimony, any given violent crime in New York City is 13 times more likely to be committed by a black than by a white; this ratio is typical of crime rates across the country.

Perhaps Patterson is thinking of white-collar crime when he implies a lack of attention to some category of allegedly less-black crime. While it is undoubtedly the case that blacks are underrepresented at the highest levels of leadership in corporate America, there is no evidence that blacks are underrepresented among white collar criminals or among people committing crime in the workplace. In 1992, University of Pennsylvania law professor Regina Austin wrote a breathtakingly awful article in the California Law Review celebrating black employees who steal from their employers and and “clerks in stores [who] cut their friends a break.” Nowhere did Austin suggest that these admirable “hustlers” were an underrepresented species among employees; her purpose was merely to praise them for fighting an oppressive power structure.

In any case, after the 24-year sentence for Enron’s Jeff Skilling, the 25-year sentence for Bernie Ebbers of WorldCom, the 15-year sentence for octogenarian John Rigas of Adelphia (down from the 215 years requested by the prosecutor), and the up to 25 years for Tyco’s Dennis Kozlowski, it is hard to take seriously the charge that white-collar criminals are let off with a slap on the wrist. But even if penalties for business crime were tripled, it would not significantly change the demographics of the jail population, because the rate of white collar crime pales in significance to street crime.

As for the law enforcement system “unfairly” focusing on drug offenses, Patterson has clearly never been to a police-community meeting in Harlem, Brooklyn’s Bedford-Stuyvesant, or any other poor urban neighborhood. Had he done so, he would have heard the following full-throated cry from the community: “Get the dealers off the streets and keep them off the streets.” Law-abiding residents of poor minority neighborhoods cannot understand why dealers arrested one day are back on the corner the next day; they rail against prosecutors who plead out drug crimes rather than sentencing the perpetrators to serious time. Unlike ivory-tower academics, people who live in the midst of the drug trade understand that violence is its constant subtext. Whether or not a dealer is actually flashing a gun at any given moment, the threat of gun violence is ever-present where the drug culture flourishes, which is why it scares the heck out of poor, upstanding citizens who live with it.

Patterson also decries “draconian mandatory sentencing.” But such sentencing regimes were a response to popular anger against judges who let criminals back on the street to prey on the law-abiding. And the alleged “retreat from rehabilitation” in prisons came after the recognition in the 1970s that such programs had little effect on recidivism. Prison rehab efforts still show only “modest reductions” in recidivism, wrote criminologist Jeremy Travis in 2001. To be sure, much could be improved in how we hold prisons accountable for the prisoners they release and in how we reintegrate ex-cons into society. But a bigger problem is that most inmates take no advantage of the programs that are available to them.  

After his unconvincing list of examples of criminal-justice bias, Patterson can’t help throwing in a final catch-all to explain the astronomical black-incarceration rate: “old-fashioned racism” — just in case we didn’t get the message the first ten times around. Of course, this Harvard sage presents no examples of “old-fashioned racism;” his invocation of it is nothing more than a verbal tic.

After this tirade against institutional racism, Patterson’s discussion of black crime rates and family breakdown is anti-climactic. But just to make sure that his standing with liberal elites is unassailable, at the end of his piece, Patterson lets fly a few swipes at conservatives. He blames the black incarceration rate on, inter alia, the “hypocritical refusal of conservative politicians to put their money where their mouths are on family values.” This charge, like so much else, is made up out of whole cloth. The only politicians and policy makers who have tried to programmatically strengthen family values are conservatives; the marriage movement, spearheaded by the Heritage Foundation’s Robert Rector, seeks to channel a portion of federal welfare dollars into marriage counseling for the poor. If any liberal politicians have gotten behind this idea, they are keeping quiet about it. And Patterson’s call for “greatly expand[ed] social services for infants and children” — as if the last 40 years of poverty policy haven’t proven the futility of such money sinkholes — is a pathetic diversion from the only effective social service for children: two married parents.

The Jena protesters and their media enablers will take what they want from Patterson’s oped and ignore the rest. And meanwhile, the necessary effort to reintegrate more young black men into law-abiding society — above all, by revaluing marriage — will be delayed for another day.

Heather Mac Donald is a fellow at the Manhattan Institute.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: heathermacdonald; jena; jena6; orlandopatterson

1 posted on 10/01/2007 10:26:12 AM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

“The high incarceration rate of black males is not “solely the result of white racism,”

Not solely? How about NOT AT ALL? It’s because they broke the law.


2 posted on 10/01/2007 10:28:01 AM PDT by Slapshot68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slapshot68

Don’t blacks have the highest drop-out rate of any race from our free educational system?


3 posted on 10/01/2007 10:30:48 AM PDT by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I agree with the writer about the legitimacy of judicial restoration, but I think she misses the point of the issue from a leftist stand point.

What the leftists believe is that the crime is a cultural phenomenon, which has been greatly influenced by the exploitation of race by the White Man. They see mandatory sentencing as being inherently unfair because the break down of the Black family is the fault of the White Man and that makes the high level of Blacks in jail, the fault of the White Man, too. All you have to do to see how well judicial restoration works is to look at Philadelphia. Black criminals are never sentenced to serve the mandatory minimum time in Phila.

This is difficult to explain because I am listening to Clarence Thomas on Rush, but I think that Justice Thomas would agree that judicial restoration is all about blaming someone else for the problems of minorities and not taking responsibility for their own lives.


4 posted on 10/01/2007 10:58:34 AM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

That honor would belong to Hispanics, but keep in mind many of them are recent immigrants who can barely speak the language, if they can.


5 posted on 10/01/2007 11:08:24 AM PDT by Clemenza (Rudy Giuliani, like Pesto and Seattle, belongs in the scrap heap of '90s Culture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

People want dealers off the street because dealers and violence go together - a feature of the War on Drugs.

End the War on Drugs, and the dealers disappear from the streets, without the expense of prison.

The violent crime won’t disappear, but it might diminish. And we’ll have more room for real criminals.

A real obstacle to reducing crime: political fear of speaking truth to race activists.


6 posted on 10/01/2007 11:46:16 AM PDT by secretagent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eva
It's interesting to study the abject failure of the Communist Party to enlist African-Americans to their cause in the 20's, 30's, 40's, and even the 50's.

Despite the very real oppression inflicted upon blacks by segregation centered in the firmly Democrat-controlled states of the old South, on the whole, they remained patriotic Americans with demonstrably strong family values.

It's also interesting to note that the illegitimacy rate among white people has surpassed that of African Americans during that period, while the rate of illegitimate birth among African-Americans has absolutely skyrocketed to over 90% in many inner city neighborhoods and to well over 70% nationwide.

It's the same percentage of African-Americans that unthinkingly deliver their votes (whether they know it or not) to the Democrat Party that runs their lives through Government Programs they installed and that won't go away no matter who's in office.

And now they are outnumbered by illegal aliens and their illegal offspring, who are also entitled to Affirmative Action. If the Republicans had half-a-brain, they would run a very strong African-American candidate for Vice President, (my pick is Steele from my MD, or Blackwell from Ohio) and lay this painful concept out on the table.

Before their fellow Americans turn against them completely, the crime, substance abuse, and illegitimacy that drive the lives of the black "underclass" have to be confronted. It ain't gonna be pretty.

7 posted on 10/01/2007 1:06:50 PM PDT by Zerodown (Draft Petraeus. Let's win this one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Zerodown

There used to be an essay on the Democratic Socialists of America site that explained that the term progressive was chosen as a euphemism for socialism because the Blacks were turned off by the term socialism.

It seems that the Black population feared the government intrusion that socialism represented, but weren’t opposed to the free hand outs, once they were convinced that they were victims, and therefore deserved the hand outs.

Clarence Thomas was explaining in his Rush interview, how he had become enraged during the civil rights/Black power period and how he finally realized that the hate and desire for pay back was destroying him and how he prayed to God to remove the hate from his heart. I think that I am going to buy his book for people for a Christmas gift. It sounds like something everyone could learn from.


8 posted on 10/01/2007 1:28:42 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Eva
They see mandatory sentencing as being inherently unfair because the break down of the Black family is the fault of the White Man and that makes the high level of Blacks in jail, the fault of the White Man, too.

In some respects is IS the fault of the White Man. White Democrats designed the welfare state to keep recipients from developing their independence in order to maintain an indentured constituency.

9 posted on 10/01/2007 2:00:05 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (Duncan Hunter for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

True, true, but that’s not the particular meta-narrative that the left is promoting.


10 posted on 10/01/2007 4:26:10 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
All of which serves to strengthen the views of people associated with Vdare that multiculturalism weakens the American fabric through the presence of people of different backgrounds who don't share common values - such as obeying the law. If liberals can't bring themselves to acknowledge a civilized society must be based on law, then the polyglot society they hold up as a mirror to the world must of necessity disintegrate and tumble into chaos. The Left may be doing by its criticism of reasonable law and order measures push the country to adopt more extreme methods in dealing with lawlessness.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

11 posted on 10/01/2007 9:31:00 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson