'NAFTA Superhighway stops here,' says Okla. senator

What has already happened:

• SPP: Official effort began at a summit in Waco, TX March 23, 2005 • Three summits have been held, attended by those listed above and others not announced. Only privately invited media were allowed. Details released can be found on the website www.spp.gov • The concept is being sold as a trade and security framework. The term “North American Union” is not officially being used. • 20 “tri-national working groups” have already been established and have worked out agreements in the policy areas listed above. • Kansas City has designated $2.5m of taxpayers money to establish the inland port • April 18, 2007: Montana Senate passed an anti-NAU bill by an overwhelming vote 32-18. • Pres. Bush has authorized a “pilot test” allowing Mexican trucks to operate freely across the U.S. beginning in May 2007.

Nope, nothing happening here. The two referenced freepers are either idiots or quislings. Ignore them. I will.

We seem to have a couple of "globalists" who see nothing wrong with turning over our country's sovreignty to an international, non-accountable, un-elected, multi-national, agency that will institute many far-reaching changes in the way Americans live and work forever.

I thought we were talking about I-35, and I'm still having difficulty imagining how it impacts our sovereignty. I mean, it was constructed decades ago. It connects to Mexico.

I agree we sidetracked on the "no inspections until KC" issue but I'll remind you that no one, including this author, says that will be the case. Thus, it is "reasonable to surmise" nothing . . . you are simply entitled to your opinion.

This discussion always ends with one side screaming "globalist" (whatever that means--it's definition is as loose as the evidentiary standard on this thread), yet I don't think I'm necessarily being a "globalist" by directing everyone's attention to (and ridiculing) what some knuckle-dragging idiot from Oklahoma said about international traffic laws. Nor is it "reasonable to surmise" anything I feel about the dissolution of the United States from the above. He's just an idiot, plain and simple . . . and he gave me a good laugh.

Since there is planned a "port of entry" in KCMO, and that port of entry is well within the (soon to be former) boundaries of the U.S., it is reasonable to surmise that is where the inspections will occur.

Prove it. You said this proof was on their own website. I guess you were lying. Thanks for playing. Thanks for the laughs. Now run away.

So will you just shut up and ignore me? You've been promising for months! Quit whining.

__________________________________

Shut up? Not likely.

Ignore you? Easy, just like walking past a bum on the street who is rambling about UFOs.

Months? Well, that's just a lie.

Whining? Nice try.

You may reply (I'll bet you can't stop yourself). I won't.

That's my point. I don't care if you reply or not. But when you whine to someone else that I'm a "traitor," or "quisling," then you are not ignoring me by definition.

So ignore me if you feel like it, just don't claim you are ignoring me when you are not. Get it?

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.