Replies

We seem to have a couple of "globalists" who see nothing wrong with turning over our country's sovreignty to an international, non-accountable, un-elected, multi-national, agency that will institute many far-reaching changes in the way Americans live and work forever.

I thought we were talking about I-35, and I'm still having difficulty imagining how it impacts our sovereignty. I mean, it was constructed decades ago. It connects to Mexico.

I agree we sidetracked on the "no inspections until KC" issue but I'll remind you that no one, including this author, says that will be the case. Thus, it is "reasonable to surmise" nothing . . . you are simply entitled to your opinion.

This discussion always ends with one side screaming "globalist" (whatever that means--it's definition is as loose as the evidentiary standard on this thread), yet I don't think I'm necessarily being a "globalist" by directing everyone's attention to (and ridiculing) what some knuckle-dragging idiot from Oklahoma said about international traffic laws. Nor is it "reasonable to surmise" anything I feel about the dissolution of the United States from the above. He's just an idiot, plain and simple . . . and he gave me a good laugh.