Posted on 09/30/2007 5:10:22 PM PDT by VOA
Please see following posts for URL links to the
discussion threads for Parts 1, 2, 3 and 4 of the series.
(VOA's boilerplate from prior threads)
All commentary regarding personal experience, family tales of WWII,
and critique of how Burns (and PBS) handles topics are welcome.
Hopefully the threads on the seven episodes will serve as
guides when this large documentary becomes required viewing in
high schools.
Comments on how Burns handled the documenatry (positive,
negative, or neutral) will come in handy when "the younger
generation" sees the series. Especially if Burns takes a
"Smithsonian" tact to some topics...leaving people to wonder
"who the good guys were" during the epic struggle.
I know there are people who think all the death and carnage was some sort of requirement to be worked out existentially, but they are in error.
This is total propaganda tonight making American Marines the bad guys. I said to heck with the other episodes because I knew the Director, Burns is a flaming anti-war liberal.
My father, who fought bravely on Luzon, Phillipines, would kick the living crap out of Burns for this travesty tonight.
My mother's eldest brother served in Pelau ~ he said it was crap.
Turned out it was crap ~ a two year long battle with massive casualties for no discernible purpose.
Man didn't come back the same.
And who would have known this at the time? What if Germany had produced a nuke first? When you return from your trip to Neptune, let me know.
I agree with your post.
My Dad would have watched every moment of this ...I am glad he was spared this insult.
I was going to buy this series. Now not only will I save my money, but I will not waste my time watching one more minute of Mr. Burns’ great delusional adventure.
The Japanese were almost as close to building nukes as we were and had construction underway on giant submarines that could carry planes close enough to the US to mount raids.
But that'd been on the West Coast ~ which was terribly underpopulated and undeveloped at the time ~ not a major threat to most Americans or their property.
Few extra billion bucks in the project, and we could have had those bombs earlier and been bombing Berlin in late 1944.
Thinly veiled anti war revisionism. Burns is the military’s equivalent of a “jock sniffer”.
The Joe Medicine Crow was a bit of sunshine.
Extending mercy and fulfilling the four requirements to be a cadidate
for chief...pretty good.
And totally consistent with the Indians (yeah, Native Americans)
my dad grew up with in Oklahoma.
I don’t know the number, but the Indian males sign up at a high percentage
for a military hitch...in war or peace.
I have to agree with most of the negative posts. I was pretty fed up after the 2nd part but continue to watch. Tonight reached new lows. Thought I saw Kerry once or twice. The narration seems to be where the crap comes from not the Vets that are doing the talking.
The constant identity politics are beginning to grate on me. It’s never enough just to report shared experience, everything must be filtered through a cultural identity. It’s never “In the war, I experienced....” It must always be stated as “As a member of X group, in the war I experienced...”
I flipped to the series at a truly random time. The show was in the throes of Japanese internment. I thought it was the height of atrocious luck on my part, but I lost all desire to see more, and I managed to avoid melancholy over anything I might have missed. It struck me as a Ken Burns agenda piece. You can have my part of it.
"The constant identity politics are beginning to grate on me. "
"
As a tenured faculty member of color,
I'm inclined to agree.
That seemed to be the sense of the entire episode.
Actually, the letter to which you refer I thought was entirely plausable. There was another statement that I turned to my spouse and said. That is hind-sight observation. Can’t remember which one of the speakers it referred to.
Well, I don’t know what kind of experience you guys are looking for. We are living in a partitioned society and apparently its important to find veterans from every ethnic group and race so that the show appeals to everybody. Okay, fair enough, I can work around that. As I know from looking at my kids history text thats the way they write history now. I tell him I remember when Sojourner Truth wasn’t considered an important American historic character.
After watching a couple of these episodes now I guess I understand what the Mexican-American community was complaining about. They didn’t get their fair share of representation. If we are going to feature white, black, red, and yellow Americans we damn well better feature some brown. I’m sure there were a lot more people of Hispanic heritage in the U.S. military than Japanese. Its hard to believe that the PBS crew would screw up racial math since they invented it.
The “four towns” approach doesn’t really ring true to me. The woman, (researcher?) who appeared said that method wasn’t working for them so they decided to find some notable World War II survivors like Paul Fussel and hang the story on them, find out where they were from and then work the 4 town angle down from there. They just picked the home towns of their featured veterans.
I mean, its clearly a PBS product, but for all of that it doesn’t seem unwatchable. I’m fascinated by personal stories and memoirs and this does a pretty good job of bringing some pretty interesting stories to the screen. You guys complaing seem like you are really reaching to find something wrong with this.
My dad would have been insulted as well.
What battalion was your dad in? My dad fought on Luzon as well.
Paul Fussell is a well known anti-war leftist. He is no more the voice of WWII infantrymen than Elton John would be. Just because he served doesn’t mean that his distorted view of what happened has to be accepted.
The one good thing that Fussell has done in his miserable life is to collect and publish war poetry, primarily from WWI. Beyond that I have no use for him and his opinion. I suspect that he was a pretty poor platoon leader.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.