Your Statement - “So the seemingly shocking idea of the state being in blood and murder is anything but. Frankly what is the difference between the state and abortion and the fact that millions of responsible couples do not even have children because they are so taxed they can little afford them?”
My Responce -
This comment is so outrageous that I don’t even know where to begin in responding to it. If you believe that there is no difference between couples choosing not to have children and dismembering a living innocent child then I am ashamed that you call yourself a Republican. If you simply want a strong leader who has no regard for morality but is anti-communist, fiscally conservative, and will support a strong military then you should have lived in 1932 and voted for Hitler. Fortunately, most Republicans do see that the murder of innocent is a horrible unjustice - I fear what our nation would become if more people were to adopt your views.
If most strident pro-life advocates were not so repellingly absolutist they could expand their support base and could well achieve most of their objectives.
You are a perfect example of why that isn’t so.
You need to read deeper.
Hitler was very pro children. He was not a fiscal conservative and ran the printing press and more imprudently issued foreigner bonds he could no longer pay the interest on. He then invaded to physically bring goods and labor that he could no longer borrow to pay for.
I am not aware of any Republican state that doesn’t allow abortion, although many require seat belts and no smoking. I guess that can give you a idea as to your delusions about the feelings of Republican masses and what they get done. As far as abortion in the Republican party, it is the same as fiscal restraint. All talk and no action.