[DieHard the Hunter]

> Except that back then the principal would have sided with the father and expelled the little creep.

...except nowadays it is just as likely that Daddy’s little skank was the instigator, and the schoolboy the innocent victim.

Thank Britney et al for that!

[L98Fiero]

“Thank Britney et al for that!”

Heh, Brittney wasn’t even a twinkle in her daddy’s eye when girls were coming around tapping on my window and calling me at all hours. Aggressive girls are nothing new. Agreeable girls even less so.

[BillyAqua]

"...except nowadays it is just as likely that Daddy’s little skank was the instigator, and the schoolboy the innocent victim. Thank Britney et al for that!"

Exactly! If all these self righteous posters could just see a photo of this boy and girl together I'm sure they wouldn't be able to discern any age or maturity difference. It's the BOTH of them, not just the boy. With an age difference of probably 20 months between this pair of teens, it's absolutely ludicrous to charge the boy with "sexual assault" because of the 'age difference'. I wonder how many times the good Dad allowed his princess to shop at slut shops like Abercrombe, where the big poster at the doorway is a young man with his zipper unzipped and his pubes showing? The young girls today are nothing but temptresses, and they certainly understand this. Actually, they dress like hookers dressed in my day. It isn't the boy who belongs in prison, it's the "adults" who are running our twisted, perverted society.

[ElkGroveDan]

...except nowadays it is just as likely that Daddy’s little skank was the instigator, and the schoolboy the innocent victim.

You wandered into the wrong room fella. You had best move along now.

[A_Tradition_Continues]

Yup, “Daddy’s little girl” spreads her legs and the male get the crap beat out of him by her father. Makes you wonder what type of disipline “Daddy’s little girl” received.