Skip to comments.
Growing Up "Star Trek" (Star Trek, Culture And Conservatism Alert)
National Review ^
| 09//28/2007
| Peter Suderman
Posted on 09/28/2007 9:32:11 AM PDT by goldstategop
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-183 next last
A conservative's look at
Star Trek and culture. This
Star Trek fan is also a conservative. Did I mention I also love science fiction? Then do read on and let's boldly go where...
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
To: goldstategop
I’m really bummed there are no Star Treks series on currently. The Star Trek series was always thought-provoking, intelligent storytelling. That just doesn’t fly in this current climate of lobotomizing reality shows.
To: Slapshot68
The Star Trek series was always thought-provoking, intelligent storytelling.Well.....occasionally, anyway.
To: goldstategop
I grew up watching ST:TNG and I liked it. Not everything has to be politicized. It’s a TV show. I like Farscape too. I don’t agree totally with the creators’ world view, but I like the show.
4
posted on
09/28/2007 9:37:47 AM PDT
by
jjm2111
(http://www.purveryors-of-truth.blogspot.com)
To: goldstategop
Star Trek the Neurotic Generation had better effects, better acting, and better scripting than “old” Star Trek.
But the old Star Trek had better stories and was a lot more fun. If I want to be preached at, I’ll go to church.
5
posted on
09/28/2007 9:38:18 AM PDT
by
Little Ray
(Rudy Guiliani: If his wives can't trust him, why should we?)
To: Slapshot68
They were always pretty much aligned with the left in their social agenda. If you payed careful attention you would see that they didn’t like capitalism. Still, I watched it religiously and still catch the reruns. I can sift through the propaganda and still enjoy the show.
6
posted on
09/28/2007 9:39:49 AM PDT
by
saganite
To: goldstategop
I recently finished watching the three seasons on dvd (one show per dinner) and I was surprised at how anti-Irish the first season was. I still enjoyed it though. lol
7
posted on
09/28/2007 9:41:49 AM PDT
by
Berlin_Freeper
(ETERNAL SHAME on the Treasonous and Immoral Democrats!)
To: Slapshot68
A show on sci-fi comes on mondays @ 7pm. Enterprise, is a prequal to the very first ST series with Kirk & Bones. It has Scot Bakula playing the capt. It is pretty good but you would need to judge it for yourself.
To: goldstategop
Actually, if you examine ST:TNG, you’ll see that the period when the show started getting wildly popular...from about season 3 onwards...is when they started abandoning (or at least playing down) some of Roddenberry’s loopier liberal themes, and started playing up more of the Kirk-esque badass elements. Riker becaume more of a traditional authority figure, and less of an Alan Alda-meets-the horny lounge lizard kind of guy. Worf was the honor figure. The Ferengi, the capitalist bad guys, utterly flopped as villains, and so the anti-capitalist stuff was played down. The Romulans, inspired by Rome and modern day China, became the new villains, along with the Borg. Think about it; who typifies the “hive mind” better than liberals?
9
posted on
09/28/2007 9:43:23 AM PDT
by
DesScorp
To: goldstategop
I watch Star Trek: Voyager - it's on Spike TV, which could stand to improve its advertising, but I suffer through it to at least watch something Star Trek.
Carolyn
10
posted on
09/28/2007 9:43:31 AM PDT
by
CDHart
("It's too late to work within the system and too early to shoot the b@#$%^&s."--Claire Wolfe)
To: goldstategop
I discovered girls about halfway through the first season.
It would have a whole lot cheaper to stick with Kirk and the crew. :-(
11
posted on
09/28/2007 9:43:42 AM PDT
by
Thrownatbirth
(.....when the sidewalks are safe for the little guy.)
To: goldstategop
Sulu: boldly going where no women are.
Uhura: Roddenbury's mistress, probably via casting couch, lots of good panty shots.
Nurse Chapel: love unrequited.
McCoy: Why? Even in the Sixties, WHY?
Scotty: an insult to the sobriety of Scotsmen.
Spock & Kirk: the closest thing the Sixties had to an Ambiguously Gay Duo.
In many ways, Star Trek: Enterprise was the best Trek show. More interesting writing and character development, I think.
12
posted on
09/28/2007 9:43:47 AM PDT
by
George W. Bush
(Apres moi, le deluge.)
To: goldstategop
JJ Abrams is going to screw all of Trekdom up in his movie due out Christmas 2008.
Shatner is Kirk! Nimoy is Spock! Recasting those icons with MTV generation people will give the same results of replacing Clayton Moore as the Lone Ranger!
13
posted on
09/28/2007 9:43:57 AM PDT
by
Sybeck1
(Join me for the Million Minutemen March --- Summer 2008!!)
To: goldstategop
In some ways, its strange to think that so many conservatives and, as evidenced here today, so many conservative pundits are also science-fiction fans, and even stranger to find that theyre fans of a show as vigorously liberal as Star Trek. Conservatism is about finding the best in ourselves and in others and freeing the human spirit from the shackles of oppression. There is no reason, therefore, that a conservative should not embrace the freedom offered by science fiction. However, the liberalism of Trek is highly annoying, which is why when push comes to shove I am a Stargate SG-1 fan. :)
14
posted on
09/28/2007 9:44:01 AM PDT
by
Colonel_Flagg
(We are the people.)
To: Psycho_Bunny
Ok. Spock’s Brain was DREADFUL.
15
posted on
09/28/2007 9:44:04 AM PDT
by
Politicalmom
(Of the potential GOP front runners, FT has one of the better records on immigration.- NumbersUSA)
To: goldstategop
I LOVED the original series. Campy and fun. I still have a concordance somewhere.
TNG was just boring to me.
Now, Deep Space 9 was the best soap opera on tv!
16
posted on
09/28/2007 9:45:49 AM PDT
by
netmilsmom
(To attack one section of Christianity in this day and age, is to waste time .)
To: CDHart
Voyager is my favorite, behind the Original.
I’d take Janeway as my Captain over ol’ Boiled Onion Head any day. :)
17
posted on
09/28/2007 9:46:25 AM PDT
by
Politicalmom
(Of the potential GOP front runners, FT has one of the better records on immigration.- NumbersUSA)
To: All
Where Kirk-era Star Trek took what was essentially a Cold War liberal view of society, arguing for racial tolerance while wrestling (in Kirks case, often literally) with relations to foreign or more accurately, alien entities of overwhelming power, Star Trek: The Next Generation debuted as little more than an hour long commercial for socialism.
and I should add : athiesm, and moral relativism... I am glad I am not the only one who saw this and felt bad about it...
18
posted on
09/28/2007 9:47:07 AM PDT
by
BigEdLB
(BigEd)
To: goldstategop
The show was almost Brechtian in its explicit endorsement of some of the wackiest tenets of the left. In the series pilot, Encounter at Farpoint, the crew is put on trial by Q, a sarcastic, temperamental, all-powerful being who reflects the shows disdain for God-figures.During the course of the trial, Lt. Riker proclaims that Humanity is no longer a savage race! Roughly translated, this comes out as, Hey there God, not only are you a belligerent twit, but we dont need you any more nyah-nyah, nyah-nyah! Somewhere, a cranky tenured professor is telling the same thing to his freshman lit class.
The writer missed the point,Q was a near omnipotent being that had all the negative qualities in himself that he hated in mankind,in other words a Super jerk.I never saw any anti religion or anti capitalism in that episode.some people just like grasping at straws
19
posted on
09/28/2007 9:48:36 AM PDT
by
Charlespg
(Peace= When we trod the ruins of Mecca and Medina under our infidel boots.)
To: goldstategop
Star Trek TNG was predicated on social Darwinism that allowed us to "evolve" into a society of Utopian socialism, but that stuff was pretty easy to spot and overlook.
As a science fiction geek I still loved it.
20
posted on
09/28/2007 9:48:42 AM PDT
by
colorado tanker
(I'm unmoderated - just ask Bill O'Reilly)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-183 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson