Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne

Clearly NASA’s goal is not primarily space exploration. Must be something else. What, then?


34 posted on 09/27/2007 4:09:13 PM PDT by RightWhale (25 degrees today. Phase state change accomplished.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: RightWhale

35 years, $350 billion dollars and about all we have to show for it is a shuttle that we cross our finges for every time it lefits off, and a space station for which we likely paid 75% of the cost, yet call it an international space station.

If you think I’m being too picky, so be it. I think that’s a fair judgement. It’s as fair as mine is.

Look, I’ve voiced my opinion and it’s okay by me if you folks want to come down on me for doing it.

I realize not all the decisions were made by NASA, but the end result is, we’re not getting the job done.

Where’s the technology spin-off today, like the R&D from the sixties gave us. A concerted effort to develop an effort to the moon and beyond would provide great boost to our economy today if we’d get with it.


35 posted on 09/27/2007 4:22:03 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Hillary has pay fever. There she goes now... "Ha Hsu, ha hsu, haaaa hsu, ha hsu...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson