Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: saganite

Look, to a certain extent I’m playing the devils advocate here. I’m not here to pester you guys, but dang folks. You want to know if there’s water on Ceres. We haven’t been back to the moon in decades, but water on Ceres is a top priority. That is just senseless to me.

Pick a planet, any planet and let’s find out what we need to go there and do it. As we branch out, THEN we need to know about Ceres, not now.

What is NASAs budget each year. What does that amount to over 35 years? Where’s the beef?


24 posted on 09/27/2007 2:03:46 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Hillary has pay fever. There she goes now... "Ha Hsu, ha hsu, haaaa hsu, ha hsu...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne

Where’s the beef?

Cheaper to find out if there’s really anything worth going out there for with these (relatively) inexpensive probes. No sense funding a 100 billion dollar manned mission to Mars if there’s nothing there worth studying. Now, if one of those probes detects life? Then 100 billion would be cheap to go check it out.


25 posted on 09/27/2007 2:18:22 PM PDT by saganite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson