Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ruling gives equal access to gay rights group at Maple Grove high (MN)
WCCO.com/AP ^ | 9/25/07 | AMY FORLITI

Posted on 09/26/2007 9:41:16 AM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo

The Osseo school district must give a student-run gay rights group at Maple Grove Senior High the same privileges it offers other extracurricular clubs, such as the use of school rooms for meetings, a federal judge ruled Tuesday.

U.S. District Judge Joan Ericksen issued a permanent injunction that puts the group Straights and Gays for Equality, also known as SAGE, on equal footing as other groups.

Two students, their parents and SAGE sued Osseo Area Schools in 2005, claiming the Twins Cities suburban district violated the federal Equal Access Act, which holds that public schools must extend the same privileges to all student-organized, non-curricular clubs.

SAGE contended that groups including synchronized swimming, cheerleading, and the Black Achievers were allowed to publicize meetings over the school's public address system and have access to school facilities for meetings, but members of SAGE were consistently denied such requests.

The school district had argued that these groups were given such access because they were labeled as ``curricular'' meaning their activities related to the school's curriculum. For example, the school argued, students received academic credit for participating in physical activity like synchronized swimming while the subject of Black Achievers related to classes that promote leadership and positive relationship building.

Ericksen disagreed, saying cheerleading, Black Achievers and other groups were not directly related to any class.

``The District's argument is circular the District deems certain student groups curricular because it sanctions them, but the District decides which groups to sanction,'' the judge wrote in a footnote. ``This type of decision making is exactly what the Equal Access Act is meant to prohibit.''

The school district had classified SAGE as a noncurricular group. Such groups could put up posters only on a community bulletin board and outside their meeting places and were prohibited from using other forms of school communication, according to the 11-page ruling.

Ericksen ordered the school to treat SAGE like any other ``curricular'' student group when it came to access for meetings, avenues for communication and other rights.

An attorney for the defendants said he was not in a position to comment. A phone message left for a district spokeswoman and an e-mail left for the Maple Grove Senior High principal were not immediately returned Tuesday.

Genevieve Zimmerman and Dave Pinto, attorneys for the student plaintiffs who have graduated said the two were ``thrilled'' with the court ruling. ``The students were always after equal access, not special access,'' Zimmerman said.

SAGE formed at the school during the 2002-2003 school year, the lawsuit said, ``to promote tolerance and respect for Maple Grove Senior High School students and faculty through education and activities.'' While some incidents date to the fall of 2003, SAGE members started to find their requests regularly denied in the 2004-2005 school year.

The two female students who brought the lawsuit graduated in spring 2006. They are named only by their initials in the lawsuit.

The defendants include the school district, the high school, current and past superintendents, the school's principal and the district's school board members.

The ruling solidifies an April 2006 preliminary order that Ericksen issued while the case moved through the court. That preliminary injunction was upheld by the U.S. Court of Appeals.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; US: Minnesota
KEYWORDS: glsen; gsa; homosexualagenda; sexclub
Homosexuality is apparently no longer a choice or genetic.....

It's an "extracurricular activity".

1 posted on 09/26/2007 9:41:20 AM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo
It's always about gaining access to other people's children.
2 posted on 09/26/2007 9:42:26 AM PDT by FormerLib (Sacrificing our land and our blood cannot buy protection from jihad.-Bishop Artemije of Kosovo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

As long as they don’t try to say a prayer before their meetings....


3 posted on 09/26/2007 9:44:21 AM PDT by NurdlyPeon (Thompson / Hunter in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FormerLib

Can there be any other Sex Clubs at the school? This is unfair to the S&M Community.


4 posted on 09/26/2007 9:45:33 AM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wallcrawlr
um....MN, PING!!
5 posted on 09/26/2007 9:47:59 AM PDT by Jersey Republican Biker Chick (RIP Eric Medlen. You will be missed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy
"Can there be any other Sex Clubs at the school? This is unfair to the S&M Community."

Um....will they let the whips and chains past school security?

6 posted on 09/26/2007 9:49:56 AM PDT by Jersey Republican Biker Chick (RIP Eric Medlen. You will be missed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

“U.S. District Judge Joan Ericksen issued a permanent injunction that puts the group Straights and Gays for Equality, also known as SAGE, on equal footing as other groups.”

Even though none of the other clubs are proponents of risky games to be played with members genitals?


7 posted on 09/26/2007 9:51:49 AM PDT by L98Fiero (A fool who'll waste his life, God rest his guts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo
This is why I am against prayer in schools, religious groups meeting at school, etc. The door swings both ways and this is the negative side to it. I am an evangelical Christian (Southern Baptist - Pentacostal mix), but wisdom dictates that if Christians can pray in school around the flag pole, so can Muslims.
8 posted on 09/26/2007 9:51:54 AM PDT by BKerr (Swap principle for power and you'll end up with neither! Vote Thompson 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

So Bible study groups are back?


9 posted on 09/26/2007 9:53:13 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo
...students received academic credit for participating in physical activity like synchronized swimming...

Nothing is more gay that synchronized swimming, so therefore, the aims of group can easily be connected to a class that is already offered.

10 posted on 09/26/2007 9:53:51 AM PDT by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy

Parents should make sure that ex-gays are represented at all “Gay-Straight” alliance organizations on public school grounds.


11 posted on 09/26/2007 9:58:57 AM PDT by FormerLib (Sacrificing our land and our blood cannot buy protection from jihad.-Bishop Artemije of Kosovo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: <1/1,000,000th%

“So Bible study groups are back?”

Don’t bet on it.....


12 posted on 09/26/2007 10:01:05 AM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo (Tracking The Flyin' Imams Since 11/20/06)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

I think the “Hostages” ought to walk out!!

Students shouldn’t be forced to endure this by homosexuals and their government masters..!


13 posted on 09/26/2007 10:38:35 AM PDT by JSDude1 (When a liberal represents the Presidential Nominee for the Republicans; THEY'RE TOAST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FormerLib

great idea..and allow them to have christians that are opposed to the homosexual agend (and maybe wittness to Christ’s love to those unrepentant!)


14 posted on 09/26/2007 10:40:15 AM PDT by JSDude1 (When a liberal represents the Presidential Nominee for the Republicans; THEY'RE TOAST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

seems like GLSEN is changing its name again to hide from automated news clipping services.


15 posted on 09/26/2007 10:50:13 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

But. . . But... But I htought they already had access to the bathrooms at most public schools.


16 posted on 09/26/2007 12:44:45 PM PDT by StonyBurk (ring)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BKerr

Only if one uses the post modern godless interpretation of
the First Amendment.— Oh I know I’m wishful—but there is nothing in the original intent —Nothing in the language used to suggest what you claim. Our public schools held
to the Norhtwest Ordinance —and the foundations of American education without judicial interference until after the Civil War.Then the nutcases decided to reform
American education to exclude religion and morality


17 posted on 09/26/2007 12:51:44 PM PDT by StonyBurk (ring)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: StonyBurk
....and the foundations of American education without judicial interference until after the Civil War.

You are exactly correct. People think that the Civil War was fought over slavery, but it was fought over State's rights as sovereign, individual quasi nations under a pact called the United States (Nations) of America. Once the north won, individual states all but ceased to exist.

18 posted on 09/26/2007 1:05:51 PM PDT by BKerr (Swap principle for power and you'll end up with neither! Vote Thompson 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: BKerr
Declaration of the Immediate Causes Which Induce and Justify the Secession of South Carolina from the Federal Union

The people of the State of South Carolina, in Convention assembled, on the 26th day of April, A.D., 1852, declared that the frequent violations of the Constitution of the United States, by the Federal Government, and its encroachments upon the reserved rights of the States, fully justified this State in then withdrawing from the Federal Union; but in deference to the opinions and wishes of the other slaveholding States, she forbore at that time to exercise this right. Since that time, these encroachments have continued to increase, and further forbearance ceases to be a virtue...

...The Constitution of the United States, in its fourth Article, provides as follows: "No person held to service or labor in one State, under the laws thereof, escaping into another, shall, in consequence of any law or regulation therein, be discharged from such service or labor, but shall be delivered up, on claim of the party to whom such service or labor may be due."

This stipulation was so material to the compact, that without it that compact would not have been made. The greater number of the contracting parties held slaves, and they had previously evinced their estimate of the value of such a stipulation by making it a condition in the Ordinance for the government of the territory ceded by Virginia, which now composes the States north of the Ohio River...

...We affirm that these ends for which this Government was instituted have been defeated, and the Government itself has been made destructive of them by the action of the non-slaveholding States. Those States have assume the right of deciding upon the propriety of our domestic institutions; and have denied the rights of property established in fifteen of the States and recognized by the Constitution; they have denounced as sinful the institution of slavery; they have permitted open establishment among them of societies, whose avowed object is to disturb the peace and to eloign the property of the citizens of other States. They have encouraged and assisted thousands of our slaves to leave their homes; and those who remain, have been incited by emissaries, books and pictures to servile insurrection...



Granted there's plenty there about states rights but the primary 'right' they're b******g about is slavery.
19 posted on 09/26/2007 2:11:28 PM PDT by Raymann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson