To: ExSoldier
They said the same things about Reagan. Whether Hunter is another Reagan isn’t the issue, though. What is the issue is a nominating process that we have to trust or change so that we can trust it. I’m getting the impression that people don’t trust it because they want to rig it in favor of the electable candidates to prevent a Duncan Hunter from slipping by. It really seems like a return to the smoke-filled room selection process.
14 posted on
09/25/2007 3:35:04 AM PDT by
Dahoser
(America's great untapped alternative energy source: The Founding Fathers spinning in their graves.)
To: Dahoser
The “system” is the best in the world and you do not like it and mistrust it because you cannot fathom why the rest of the Conservative base does not rally behind your guy (I really like Hunter but he does not excite the base... sad but true.). We have two Rino’s and a Conservative in the top three... the difference is that most of us want a Conservative to WIN... America will perish under the dims... or at least be so wounded that she will die. Fred is a Conservative and is leading in 99% of the National polls and closing in fast in the North... he pretty much owns the South.
LLS
19 posted on
09/25/2007 4:23:43 AM PDT by
LibLieSlayer
(Support America, Kill terrorists, Destroy dims!)
To: Dahoser
Im getting the impression that people dont trust it because they want to rig it in favor of the electable candidates to prevent a Duncan Hunter from slipping by. The reality is that Hunter can't even get by Mike Huckabee in the polls. He seems no more capable of winning the nomination than Alan Keyes.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson