Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Southack

I think that if this truly was an ‘intentional’ as opposed to an ‘accident’ that the intended recipient is Vladimir Putin. Putin has been pushing his Bear bombers close to NATO airspace on recon flights.

The ‘message’ could be: “Don’t Eff with a USAF bomber because he might be carrying nukes.”


92 posted on 09/25/2007 7:23:14 AM PDT by Tallguy (Climate is what you plan for, weather is what you get.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Tallguy

Putin flies his bombers near our assets in order to show potential client states like Iran and North Korea that Russia offers an alternative counter-balance to the U.S.

Loading nukes onto a B-52 means nothing to Russia in that context.

However, nuclear-armed, flying B-52’s *do* mean something to North Korea and Syria and Iran...as does Israel’s open statement that Damascus will be wiped out if Syria uses chems or nukes.

Both statements by the U.S. with visible nukes on the B-52 as well as Israel’s diplomatic punch were coordinated messages.

...and the lack of “spontaneous” protests by the easily incited crowds in the target countries shows that the leadership in question “got” the message.


93 posted on 09/25/2007 7:42:18 AM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson