To: Petronski; ejonesie22; Allegra; BlackElk; mnehrling
Not quite sure where to post this, but if you go to the ronpaulforums.com thread,
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad at Columbia *ON NOW* , basicly they liked the guy, didn't like the neocon University president at all. No comments I'd consider anything worse than neutral, though I only read the first 5 or 6 pages.
627 posted on
09/24/2007 1:04:28 PM PDT by
SJackson
(isolationism never was, never will be acceptable response to[expansionist] tyrannical governments)
To: SJackson
Confirms my suspicion that a lot of the Ron Paul movement (such as it is) consists of leftists trying to boost an anti-war candidate within the GOP.
No real libertarian could have anything but complete loathing and contempt for Ahmawhackjob, an enemy of every form of human liberty if ever there was one.
651 posted on
09/24/2007 1:19:28 PM PDT by
Enchante
(Current Democrat terror-fighting motto: "bleat, cheat, and retreat for our defeat")
To: SJackson
One comment from the Paulestinians forum:
I hate how Bollinger is priming the audience with negative sentiments.
Independent Democrat for Ron Paul
661 posted on
09/24/2007 1:24:31 PM PDT by
McGruff
(If I can't have Cheney, Fred will have to do.)
To: SJackson; Petronski; mnehrling; ejonesie22; BlackElk
Not quite sure where to post this, but if you go to the ronpaulforums.com thread, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad at Columbia *ON NOW* , basicly they liked the guy, didn't like the neocon University president at all. No comments I'd consider anything worse than neutral, though I only read the first 5 or 6 pages. There is something very, very wrong with those people. They really are disturbed.
I could only get through two pages.
Those people are nasty nutjobs.
662 posted on
09/24/2007 1:24:33 PM PDT by
Allegra
(The Surge Works While the Democrats "Betray Us.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson