Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: snugs

What disturbs me is how many women say they will vote for her strictly because she’s a woman. That is truly disturbing.

Fortunately, there are far more out there who will always vote against her because she’s Hillary. So we still have a chance.


206 posted on 09/23/2007 6:50:21 AM PDT by jmyrlefuller ("a steady drumbeat of clever, witty, observant posts throughout the morning" - Bahbah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies ]


To: jmyrlefuller
Fortunately, there are far more out there who will always vote against her because she’s Hillary.

I haven't come across one woman who says she will vote for Hillary but, interestingly enough, I've come across many who say for the first time ever, they will actively work against a candidate should she get the nomination.

222 posted on 09/23/2007 7:01:03 AM PDT by jennyjenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies ]

To: jmyrlefuller
I find the sisterhood thing very hard to understand. On one hand they scream equality but then want affirmative action to ensure it or more.

They want their cake and to get to eat it to.

IMHO the best advocate for women in public life but remaining the correct balance is Lynne Cheney she had/has a career of her own but knows when to back off and when to go on the offensive and never pulls the sisterhood card.

She got where she got on brains and obviously connections but not by affirmative action.

256 posted on 09/23/2007 7:16:07 AM PDT by snugs ((An English Cheney Chick - Big Time))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson