One more shot at Blather.
To: libstripper
2 posted on
09/22/2007 10:35:06 AM PDT by
RichInOC
(...Phi Kappa Sigma, Beta Rho '87..."Coney Island wife tamer.")
To: libstripper
And not only that, they can win against him in this lawsuit as well.
3 posted on
09/22/2007 10:35:56 AM PDT by
Kevmo
(We should withdraw from Iraq — via Tehran. And Duncan Hunter is just the man to get that job done.)
To: libstripper
I am glad Dan still believes in the story, but the facts are they had no case and should never have aired the story. Now Dan has no legal case either, but that isn’t going to stop him from looking like a fool.
To: libstripper
What’s with all the CRYING??? He is a tad unstable.
6 posted on
09/22/2007 10:38:03 AM PDT by
Suzy Quzy
(Hillary '08...Her PHONINESS is REAL!!!)
To: libstripper
Dan's suit is rather pathetic.
7 posted on
09/22/2007 10:38:31 AM PDT by
HEY4QDEMS
(What happens if you're frightened half to death........................twice?)
To: libstripper
...but, that would require integrity and honesty....and @ See B.S., there are only Airhead Liberals "lingering" that dying/disreputable company. :|
8 posted on
09/22/2007 10:39:58 AM PDT by
skinkinthegrass
(just b/c your paranoid, doesn't mean they're NOT out to get you....Run, Fred, Run. :^)
To: libstripper
Remember the guy who beat Rather up, that kept asking Gunga Dan, "What's the frequency, Kenneth?" Didn't he end up shooting (killed) someone outside of the NBC studios? IIRC they caught the crime on video.
Karma, the event sequences and circumstances should have been reversed.
I didn't say that last part.
5.56mm
9 posted on
09/22/2007 10:43:15 AM PDT by
M Kehoe
To: libstripper
"One more shot at Blather."
LMAO!
10 posted on
09/22/2007 10:43:37 AM PDT by
jrooney
(The democrats are the friend of our enemy and the enemy of our friends. Attack them, not GW!)
To: libstripper
I saw a few seconds of dan on larry, but I was laughing so hard I couldn’t hear what they were saying. Just the sight of those 2 senile, clueless, old frauds faking a serious discussion cracked me up.
To: libstripper
13 posted on
09/22/2007 11:00:19 AM PDT by
eastcobb
To: libstripper
I think Dans real problem here is just what he said;
They cant report the news the way they used to.
This is going to be fun to watch.
14 posted on
09/22/2007 11:01:38 AM PDT by
VR-21
To: libstripper

"What (crack!) is the frequency (crack!), Kenneth?"
To: libstripper
IMHO, that first sentence is not true. This guy is pandering for readers.
Shockwaves? I doubt it. In fact I suspect CBS has been expecting this. And, IMHO, they will win the suit.
17 posted on
09/22/2007 11:07:26 AM PDT by
upchuck
(Psychiatrists have labeled George Bush's South-of-the-Border obsession as mexicosis. ~ firehat)
To: libstripper
19 posted on
09/22/2007 11:10:41 AM PDT by
OCCASparky
(Steely-Eyed Killer of the Deep)
To: libstripper
... Rather said: "I've never been clearer in my mind about anything-I can't recall being clearer. And this is the right stand at the right time about the right issue."He's clearly lost it.
20 posted on
09/22/2007 11:15:59 AM PDT by
maggief
To: libstripper
CBS Can and Should Beat Dan Rather
Rather v. CBS...
reminds me of the old saying attributed to Henry Kissinger when
Iran and Iraq were locked into a Texas Steel-Cage Death Match:
It's a pity that they both can't lose.
26 posted on
09/22/2007 12:07:46 PM PDT by
VOA
To: libstripper
CBS Can and Should Beat Dan Rather
Saw that headline and had to laugh. Then I got mad! Why the hell should CBS have all the fun? Shouldn’t we all have the opportunity to beat Dan Rather?
29 posted on
09/22/2007 12:23:00 PM PDT by
upsdriver
(DUNCAN HUNTER FOR PRESIDENT!!!!)
To: libstripper
The LOL you can plainly hear wafting over the country from the general direction of Yorba Linda CA is instructing Dan to
"Always remember others may hate you, but those who hate you don't win unless you hate them. And then you destroy yourself." [Richard Nixon's Farewell To The White House Staff]
To any who thought the former churl of Saddle River, New Jersey, was speaking of himself, he was not. He was adressing the Press, Dan in particular. Nixon first made very similar remarks to Rabbi Korff on May 13, 1974, months before he resigned, and long before his farewell to the White House staff.
In the context of the interview with Rabbi Korff, Nixon said:"I know in the press room that my policies are generally disapproved of, and there are some who hate my guts with a passion [are you listening Dan?]. But I don't hate them, none of them. An individual must not return hatred for hatred.
What really destroys an individual when he is under attack is if he allows the hate against him to become part of himself and then the fury that arises within him will destroy him....To the extent that they allow their own hatreds to consume them, they will lose the rationality which is the mark of a civilized man.
Dan must set aside his present course and serve his nation and former network faithfully. Only then, Tricky Dan may one day also have 5 (Network) Presidents attend his funeral and have one of their numbers (Les Moonves?) eulogize him. Any other course will, I fear, lead to Tricky Dan's complete and utter destruction.
To: libstripper
> ... Rather may be betting that CBS will want to pay him off.
That’s my guess. CBS is likely very unwilling to disclose
what they know about the hoax documents, and the chain of
custody into CBS. Legal Discovery would force them to.
Blackmail. Legal, but blackmail nonetheless.
If they settle, they may hit up the co-conspirators to
chip into the fund. That could be one reason why Mary
went ballistic this week. Will the DNC cut a check?
On the other hand, if CBS thinks that going to trial
might give them a shot at deposing GWB, they might
decide to litigate.
33 posted on
09/22/2007 1:55:52 PM PDT by
Boundless
(Legacy Media is hazardous to your mental health)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson