Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rlmorel

Right now there is a mandate that hospitals grant care to any person that shows up at their doors. If a person with cancer shows up, even they must be stabalized, enough to return home. If hospitals do not provide this service, they can have their Medicare contract stripped out from under them. And any other government funds, can be lost as well. This would essentially shut down most hospitals.

If the federal government is going to require this, then they must pay for the services rendered to illegal immigrants.

Do I approve of illegal aliens getting free healthcare? Nope.

They belong in Mexico. That is their true home. We have not responsibilty for them, and they don’t belong here.

They can not support themselves. Citizen taxpayers of the U.S. should not have to foot the bill. It is wrong.


36 posted on 09/22/2007 10:38:20 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Hillary has pay fever. There she goes now... "Ha Hsu, ha hsu, haaaa hsu, ha hsu...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne

Ummm...I am not sure where you are coming from. I have not said I disagree, nor do I disagree. You said “Medical Centers won’t be happy about this...”

Won’t be happy about what? That they won’t be required to provide care for illegal immigrants except in emergency situations? Perhaps I am misreading the article...


41 posted on 09/22/2007 2:15:12 PM PDT by rlmorel (Liberals: If the Truth would help them, they would use it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: DoughtyOne

The The Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) provides for Emergency treatment for those who need it, something none of us (or at least I hope none of us) would consider denying to someone, the “Leave the accident victim at the side of the road” viewpoint.

However, if a person comes in with no insurance to a hospital, and wants a skin tumor removed, there is no federal requirement to do so.

If someone has no insurance, they can apply for medicaid if they are below a certain income, and if they are above a certain income, they can arrange a payment plan for services rendered.

Additionally, the hospital providing the care can draw from a fund of money provided by the federal government for the purpose of giving aid to uninsured patients, but there is no requirement that they attempt to draw on those funds. Each institution can simply refuse to participate.

But most institutions do, because invariably in the course of things, uninsured patients DO enter into the territory of non-emergent care, and most hospitals do wish to be able to draw on it.

That is not the issue at hand, though. The issue is the definition of non-emergent care as being emergent for the purposes of expanding the pool of eligible people, thus drawing us one step closer to socialized health care.


42 posted on 09/22/2007 2:46:41 PM PDT by rlmorel (Liberals: If the Truth would help them, they would use it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson