Skip to comments.
To go green, live closer to work, report says [anti-"sprawl"crusade]
LA Times ^
| Sep 21 2007
| Margot Roosevelt
Posted on 09/21/2007 2:16:14 PM PDT by republicpictures
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-86 next last
To: republicpictures
I can't move much closer. I work from my house. No commuting required. When I do have to travel, it is to a customer site. All the rest of the project team must also travel on those occasions.
41
posted on
09/21/2007 2:54:51 PM PDT
by
Myrddin
To: OpusatFR
That’s why Howard County, MD (where I live) has so many homes built in the last 20 years and so few before that.
42
posted on
09/21/2007 2:55:28 PM PDT
by
RockinRight
(Can we start calling Fred "44" now, please?)
To: DBrow
I know people who got nifty jobs in Palmdale CA, then due to business decisions of others, got transferred to LA, Redondo Beach, or Hawthorne CA, which is a heck of a commute from Palmdale (and housing costs three or four times as much). The idea was to get them to leave, voluntarily. A few times in my career, I was offered absurd relocations, when business got bad and layoffs were looming. It was just a loud hint.
I live in Massachusetts, which as everyone knows, is a Socialist pesthole...but still I took a layoff before accepting a transfer to California. Worked in there for a year, saw enough... My hideous state, multiplied by a large number. Cost of living, the "Homeless", etc.etc.
43
posted on
09/21/2007 2:56:27 PM PDT
by
Gorzaloon
(Food imported from China = Cesspool + Flavor-Straw™)
To: RockinRight
Howard County still has some charm.
I lived in PG county and that is a major mess.
44
posted on
09/21/2007 3:00:03 PM PDT
by
OpusatFR
To: JTHomes
My commute in San Diego was 7 miles one way. It took 90 minutes each way. If I waited until 10 PM, I could make the trip in about 12 minutes. That commute was a big factor in my decision to leave San Diego for Idaho. My firearms collection was another issue. Crowded stores and restaurants were yet another issue. Moving to Idaho fixed all of those problems. I even escaped the humidity and many allergens that were causing me persistent health problems. The snow in Idaho means I get a break from the weekend lawn mowing tasks.
45
posted on
09/21/2007 3:00:53 PM PDT
by
Myrddin
To: republicpictures
And live in a commune, right, got it.
46
posted on
09/21/2007 3:03:46 PM PDT
by
vpintheak
(Like a muddied spring or a polluted well is a righteous man who gives way to the wicked. Prov. 25:26)
To: republicpictures
What a bunch of jerks you guys all are.
I moved so that I'm just a mile from my work, I'm saving the planet, but you guys are destroying it even faster.
The one draw back, being so close to work, is that traffic is a bear (I'm not much one for walking) but I've found a back way, admittedly it adds 60 miles each way, but I feel AWESOME about my self the whole way.
Owl_Eagle
If what I just wrote made you sad or angry,
it was probably just a joke.
47
posted on
09/21/2007 3:03:58 PM PDT
by
End Times Sentinel
(In Memory of my Dear Friend Henry Lee II)
To: republicpictures
Live closer to work. Gee I never thought of that!
I'll talk to my boss about moving the plant right away.
Hey! Maybe we should move the farms to the middle of the city too.
48
posted on
09/21/2007 3:06:15 PM PDT
by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(A good marriage is like a casserole, only those responsible for it really know what goes into it.)
To: MediaMole
To: MediaMole
Telecommuting is your friend. Oh, I envy that. But I work in a laboratory and my company and co-workers would frown on bringing the analyzers home with me.
To: republicpictures
Just about the time they convince everyone to “move in close” to their work, L.A., New York or Houston will disappear off the face of the earth under a terrorist’s mushroom cloud. Rural America will never be the same when the rats jump that ship now fondly called the “Great American City.”
51
posted on
09/21/2007 3:12:31 PM PDT
by
Muleteam1
(The stars at night, shine big and bright, deep in the heart of Taxes!)
To: republicpictures
To go green, live closer to work, report saysWow. What a breakthrough.
52
posted on
09/21/2007 3:13:30 PM PDT
by
pogo101
To: VOA
[At least have bare-bones dormitories (a cot, vending machines and bathrooms/showers) near the worksite for some industries that require lots of irregular hours]
I hear those are pretty much the conditions some of the Indian IT outsourcing slav... err, employees live with.
"families encouraged to come at weekends"
"round-the-clock support"
Hmmmmm no thanks.
53
posted on
09/21/2007 3:15:17 PM PDT
by
VxH
(One if by Land, Two if by Sea, and Three if by Wire Transfer)
To: RockinRight
I was thinking that too. What if the wife works 60 miles away from the husband? And jobs change, too. Should we all move with every job change, and change the children’s schools each time?
Also, speaking of schools, school districts need to be considered. Suburbs have fewer jobs but better schools.
To: Lorianne
I agree, living closer to work makes sense, unless of course, you work in a very crummy area and don’t want to raise your kids there.
I think a lot of decisions on where to live center around schools and safe neighborhoods (if there is such a thing as safe neighborhoods ).
55
posted on
09/21/2007 3:20:49 PM PDT
by
Ditter
To: VxH
“Hmmmmm no thanks.”
For about 90% of jobs in the USA, I’d surely agree.
My suggestion was only for occupations like biochemistry/molecular biology
where you might start four or five processes of different time-length...
and you MUST be there at the end of the time for each process.
Doing chemistry/biochemistry/molecular biology does have this aspect
in common with being a short-order cook!
But you are absolutely right about most jobs...having a dorm near
the worksite would just be an employers’ exuse to exploit the work force.
56
posted on
09/21/2007 3:28:47 PM PDT
by
VOA
To: JTHomes
I'm 25 miles from work, I relocated to a rural part of the state where my children can play in a yard with 8x the amount of area as our previous home.
It's a trade off I'm willing to accept even though it's costing me dearly on fuel consumption.
Guess I'll have to find another way to offset the increased cost.
Cheers!
57
posted on
09/21/2007 3:29:12 PM PDT
by
#1CTYankee
(That's right, I have no proof. So what of it??)
To: Dr. Sivana
Exactly. The cities were vibrant and fun and contained real communities.
Then war on poverty, welfare and corrupt city governments and insane schools and now illegal immigrants drove everybody out and the inner cities are like Darfur.
Who would move back in to the inner cities and send their kids to school there?
To: VOA
[My suggestion was only for occupations like biochemistry/molecular biology]
Yes, that does make sense.
[But you are absolutely right about most jobs...having a dorm near the worksite would just be an employers exuse to exploit the work force.]
When I hear people describing these conditions my thought is, “man, thats not a home, it’s a hive”.
59
posted on
09/21/2007 3:37:15 PM PDT
by
VxH
(One if by Land, Two if by Sea, and Three if by Wire Transfer)
To: TexanToTheCore
Bureau of Land Management shows that 4.33 percent of our land is developed. What spraul?
Ever driven through Texas? Nebraska? Idaho?
There is no one out there.
That's because this what a liberal thinks of the US...
60
posted on
09/21/2007 3:42:28 PM PDT
by
Kozak
(Anti Shahada: There is no god named Allah, and Muhammed is a false prophet)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-86 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson