[Quicksilver]

>>>>>I believe that was the essence of what I said.

I didn't see it that way. You're remarks were nuanced rhetoric. ;^)

Easy for you to say. ;)

>>>>>>I'm not revising anything and I'm aware of Romney's record.

Really. You gave your opinion and agreed with Romney that Reagan was adamantly pro-choice.

My opinion was on the merits of Reagan's decision to sign the legislation -- nothing to do with Romney there. And, no, I did not say that I agreed with Romney with regard to Reagan being adamantly pro-choice.

>>>>>I have read them many times, plus I have done my own research. I'm comfortable with the truth as it stands.

You're an historic revisionist with no respect for the truth. ...

As I told EV once, we obviously interpret facts differently, which is okay. :)

[Reagan Man]

>>>>My opinion was on the merits of Reagan's decision to sign the legislation -- nothing to do with Romney there. And, no, I did not say that I agreed with Romney with regard to Reagan being adamantly pro-choice.

The inference you gave with your remarks is crystal clear. You make excuses for Mitt Boy and don't care who you step on in the process. Pathetic.

>>>>>As I told EV once, we obviously interpret facts differently, which is okay. :)

My guess is, EV didn't agree with you either. As the saying goes. You're entitled to your own opinion. Just not your own facts.