[Reagan Man]

>>>>My opinion was on the merits of Reagan's decision to sign the legislation -- nothing to do with Romney there. And, no, I did not say that I agreed with Romney with regard to Reagan being adamantly pro-choice.

The inference you gave with your remarks is crystal clear. You make excuses for Mitt Boy and don't care who you step on in the process. Pathetic.

>>>>>As I told EV once, we obviously interpret facts differently, which is okay. :)

My guess is, EV didn't agree with you either. As the saying goes. You're entitled to your own opinion. Just not your own facts.

[Quicksilver]

>>>>My opinion was on the merits of Reagan's decision to sign the legislation -- nothing to do with Romney there. And, no, I did not say that I agreed with Romney with regard to Reagan being adamantly pro-choice.

The inference you gave with your remarks is crystal clear. You make excuses for Mitt Boy and don't care who you step on in the process. Pathetic.

I neither said nor inferred it.

>>>>>As I told EV once, we obviously interpret facts differently, which is okay. :)

My guess is, EV didn't agree with you either.

Good guess. As I recall he questioned my sanity. :)

As the saying goes. You're entitled to your own opinion. Just not your own facts.

Indeed, as long as the facts are accurate and complete (not selective).