Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alter Kaker
Transitional fossils = Fossils of unknown origin that evolutionists try to claim as evidence of evolution.

Never mind, of course, that all "missing links" between ape and man have been debunked over time in the most embarrassing ways for evolutionists.

And, of course, the fossil record shows species appearing suddenly and fully formed, matching the Creationist model and completely refuting Darwin.

Over 250 million fossils from 250,000 species have been found, yet only a handful are even compatible with evolution and not one that can't fit into a Creationist model. If Darwin was right, there should be millions of transitional fossils.

What we have here is a lie even bigger than global warming hoax.

10 posted on 09/20/2007 8:07:19 AM PDT by Ol' Sparky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Ol' Sparky
What we have here is a lie even bigger than global warming hoax.

You made four statements before this one, each of which is absolutely, provably (and proven) untrue. They would be lies if you knew any better. . .

But I agree with you that GW is a lie, anyway.
20 posted on 09/20/2007 8:17:08 AM PDT by Filo (Darwin was right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Ol' Sparky
Never mind, of course, that all "missing links" between ape and man have been debunked over time in the most embarrassing ways for evolutionists.

You can make the same claim a thousand times a day if you'd like, but it's still not true.

Creationists seem to inhabit a strange world full shibboleths and fake facts and mythologies.

And, of course, the fossil record shows species appearing suddenly and fully formed, matching the Creationist model and completely refuting Darwin.

Except in the many thousands of instances in which you choose to ignore the fossil record. See the article, above, for a timely example.

21 posted on 09/20/2007 8:17:20 AM PDT by Alter Kaker (Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Ol' Sparky
And, of course, the fossil record shows species appearing suddenly and fully formed, matching the Creationist model and completely refuting Darwin.

LOL! Yeah, I guess the creationist "model" is pretty airtight scientifically. I mean, who can argue with "God did it" as the answer to any scientific inquiry.

29 posted on 09/20/2007 8:28:38 AM PDT by GunRunner (Thompson 2008 - Security, Unity, Prosperity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Ol' Sparky
...and not one that can't fit into a Creationist model.

And how does this fit into the Creationist model? Where does it fit in between Adam and Eve and you?

37 posted on 09/20/2007 8:38:05 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson