Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne; All

Folks I’d like you to consider whether Reuters’ reporting is accurate here. We may be seeing some of Saddam’s WMDs surface here. Reuters has a vested interest in misdirecting people. Heaven forbid it be found out that Syria did in fact get Iraq’s WMDs. Heaven forbid it be revealed that the original (blown all out of shape and rediculed endlessly) reason for entering Iraq was valid.


52 posted on 09/19/2007 6:02:50 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Sorry Hillderella, but the Hsu fits... and king Lerach would like a call. < wicked witch laughter >)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne
The presence of Iraqi WMD’s in Syria is not THE major issue now. Syria had and has the most advanced chemical WMD warfare capability in the middle east. They could have advanced their biological WMD capability with Saddams’s biological toys. Saddam eventually sent most of his nuclear research to Libya where it was safe from Israeli raids. Most of Saddams stuff was destroyed from Air Raids during Gulf War I. What remained was secretive and many believe the Russians eventually moved that to Syria. Syria and Iran both have known Chemical WMD capabilities. No reason to bring in a fog of war by relating that known capability to Saddam’s ‘apparently’ destroyed capability.
54 posted on 09/19/2007 6:43:58 PM PDT by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson