Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: A CA Guy

I am kind of dissapointed that they were ckicken enough not to answer tough religious voter’s questions.. (of course it’s more of teh plan by the elitists to take advantage of Christians- use them for votes, but meanwhile delegate them to the “back of the bus” in the Republican Party). See some of these elites are former 60’s radicals (now rich liberals made so by the corporations they once railed against!!), anyway they hate Christians, Southern voter, Middle and Red-State America..

Well I will tell them, I WON’T go along with it; I won’t give them my vote for lack of (”Somewhere else to go”..they figure ‘Who are religious ‘values voters’ going to turn (in ‘08) to the Democrats..surely not’ We may have a (liberal candidate: Guiliani, Romney, McCain, etc..) yet the Democrats are worse, and the Christians know it, they’ll vote for us no-matter what’. THe problem with this is that Republicans, Christians are not sheep (even though they have not always acted like they aren’t), and party loyalty isn’t that important. We need to deny the elites, and choose a third way: FRANKLY I COULDN’T CARE IF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY DIES, as long as Conservatism advances, and it may well require a new CONSERVATIVE Political Party to purge the leadership of the Republican Party, in the near future!

I won’t go along with the elitists of the Party..I will BUCK them, and VOTE 3RD Party if their Elite Liberal Candidate wins the Republican Nom. THAT’S A PROMISE.


12 posted on 09/18/2007 8:37:12 PM PDT by JSDude1 (When a liberal represents the Presidential Nominee for the Republicans; THEY'RE TOAST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: JSDude1

“Christians are not sheep”

Well, we are just not in the context that you use. Our shepherd is mighty and carries no party identifier alongside His name.


21 posted on 09/18/2007 9:09:00 PM PDT by Grunthor (Lazy Like a Fox)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: JSDude1

Yep, Democrats love the throw away vote like that.

Traditional stuff every election around here by mostly the libertarian types who love to benefit Democrats in the name of conservatism.

I think primaries would be the time for an attempt at the more conservative change, then once people are set as the nominee you have the real choice between the fire breathing communist Hillary and her socialized medicine, or the Republican.
The third party types are chump change that make liberals very happy because that lowers the votes for Republicans and can better get the liberal democrats in.
You have the right to help get Hillary elected if you wish, but don’t go around blind folded about what voting third party really means in elections where a lack of Republican vote can get the worst Democrat in.

Conservative third party voting in main elections ends up being passive support for the Democrat party.


27 posted on 09/19/2007 9:28:05 AM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: JSDude1
I am kind of dissapointed that they were ckicken enough not to answer tough religious voter’s questions.

Nah, they just don't view the group "Value Voters" as worthy of their time.

By the way, I am a values voter, but I would never want to be affiliated with a group that has such narcissistic tendencies.

57 posted on 09/21/2007 1:29:56 PM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson