To: George W. Bush; OrthodoxPresbyterian; P-Marlowe
Russia and China are not the point. We were in a cold war with them for years, and no one questions the validity of that cold war against them.
My point is that a trade between Iraq & Syria — oil in exchange for weapons storage — would be absolutely sensible. Not only would Syria be able to handle it with no questions asked, but they would also be able to handle it with proper technology & handling procedures.
And not only “could” handle it; they could have EASILY handled it.
158 posted on
09/20/2007 4:39:33 AM PDT by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain And Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
To: xzins
Russia and China are not the point. We were in a cold war with them for years, and no one questions the validity of that cold war against them.
My point was that Russian/China being communist was no guarantee of cooperation between the two any more than was the two Ba'athist regimes in Iraq/Syria.
My point is that a trade between Iraq & Syria...
My recollection is that is was the Jordanians who did much more to help evade oil-for-food restrictions on Saddam. And of course Europe and Asia were the customers and trading partners.
To: xzins
The Mideast is not Russia or China and you compare them at your own risk. Iraq and Syria were not enemies. They had a lot of higher level interaction. There WAS an illegal oil pipeline running millios of barrels or oil into Syria for years...UN inspectors somehow missed that.
177 posted on
09/20/2007 7:15:35 AM PDT by
cake_crumb
(May I never live to see the day America has a 'popular war'. God bless our troops.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson