Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Dozens died in Syrian-Iranian chemical weapons experiment' (WMD Iran-Syria)
Jerusalem Post ^ | 9/18/2007 | Staff

Posted on 09/18/2007 11:56:25 AM PDT by mojito

Edited on 09/19/2007 5:42:35 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

Proof of cooperation between Iran and Syria in the proliferation and development of weapons of mass destruction was brought to light Monday in a Jane's Magazine report that dozens of Iranian engineers and 15 Syrian officers were killed in a July 23 accident in Syria.

According to the report, cited by Channel 10, the joint Syrian-Iranian team was attempting to mount a chemical warhead on a scud missile when the explosion occurred, spreading lethal chemical agents, including sarin nerve gas.

Reports of the accident were circulated at the time, however, no details were released by the Syrian government, and there were no hints of an Iranian connection.

The report comes on the heels of criticism leveled by the Syrains at the United States, accusing it of spreading "false" claims of Syrian nuclear activity and cooperation with North Korea to excuse an alleged Israeli air incursion over the country this month.

According to Global Security.org, Syria is not a signatory of either the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC), - an international agreement banning the production, stockpiling or use of chemical weapons, or the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty (CTBT).

Syria began developing chemical weapons in 1973, just before the Yom Kipper War. Global Security.org cites the country as having one of the most advanced chemical weapons programs in the Middle East.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: axis; chemicalweapons; engineering101; gwot; iran; iransyria; iranwarbuildup; islamicfascism; islamofascism; lol; nervegas; oopsie; sadamswmdstash; sarin; saringas; sarinnervegas; scud; sept62007; syria; tbm; thanksnancyp; waronterror; waronterrorism; whywefight; wmd; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-193 next last
To: pissant
Maybe Mossad had a helping hand in it

Probably not. The Syrian and Iranian’s can screw things up by themselves. LOL

161 posted on 09/20/2007 5:21:46 AM PDT by Lurking in Kansas (Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mojito

Accurate damage assessment of the Syrian “Weapons Depot” is essential in the domestic & international war of words.

Anybody reviewed subscriber site: http://www.stratfor.com/ ?


162 posted on 09/20/2007 5:23:01 AM PDT by Broker (Mabuhay!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eastbound
Crossdressers.

Which one? Both? LOL

163 posted on 09/20/2007 5:24:34 AM PDT by Lurking in Kansas (Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush

The cooperation between Saddam & Syria is a matter of history. Likewise the use of Iraqi oil to pursue Iraqi aims with the Syrian government.


164 posted on 09/20/2007 5:35:41 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain And Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: mojito

This is bogus. We all know there were NO WMD’s. /sarc


165 posted on 09/20/2007 5:43:16 AM PDT by I'm ALL Right! (THOMPSON '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Califelephant
What are we waiting for?

2008 election...

166 posted on 09/20/2007 5:45:27 AM PDT by I'm ALL Right! (THOMPSON '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
You could say exactly the same for Russia and China during the Cold War. And yet we know that they were far more rivals than allies until the Soviets were approaching their collapse in the Eighties.

With respect to the each other, of course they were rivals. They were competing for regional dominance and to be the standard bearer of a shared ideology.

With respect to the west, they were allies. Whatever rivalry the two countries may have had was nothing compared to existential threat they saw (see) in the United States.

Same with Syria and Iraq... or Russia and Iraq, or China and Iran, or North Korea and Syria, or imperial Japan and Nazi Germany for that matter. America is everybody's worst enemy. And the enemy of your enemy is your friend. What was it that brought the Baathist socialists in Syria and the Iranian Shia into their currently alliance, other than a mutual hatred of the west?

The reality of the situation is, both the Iraqi Baathists and the Syrian Baathists stood to benefit greatly from embarassing the US on the matter of WMD. Of course they worked together toward that end.

167 posted on 09/20/2007 5:51:15 AM PDT by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: mojito
Jerusalem Post is very credible!!!

If it was in another publication in the area I might doubt it.

168 posted on 09/20/2007 5:59:24 AM PDT by thepresidentsbestfriend (I LOVE KAREN HANRETTY, AND KAREN HANRETTY LOVES ME :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mojito
I saw this when it went up two days ago...it’s one of those threads that give you that freaky feeling that somethings up around the corner...like real soon.
169 posted on 09/20/2007 6:14:32 AM PDT by Earthdweller (All reality is based on faith in something.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mojito

I wonder if it was a cache of chemical WMD that the Israelis took out? It would be nice to think so.


170 posted on 09/20/2007 6:26:19 AM PDT by cake_crumb (May I never live to see the day America has a 'popular war'. God bless our troops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurking in Kansas

It’s a topsy turvy world, eh?


171 posted on 09/20/2007 6:33:17 AM PDT by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: Eastbound
It’s a topsy turvy world, eh?

Yup.

Girls will be boys and boys will be girls,
Its a mixed up, muddled up, shook up world, except for Lola.
Lo-lo-lo-lo, Lola

~The Kinks

172 posted on 09/20/2007 6:37:17 AM PDT by Lurking in Kansas (Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: Our man in washington
"It will be interesting to see how the left blames this on Bush."

Why, they'll say that Saddam was "innocent" all along and Bush lied in order to invade Iraq and steal their oil for Halliburton instead of invading Iran and stealing THEIR oil while letting Saddam have it [Iran].

173 posted on 09/20/2007 6:39:04 AM PDT by cake_crumb (May I never live to see the day America has a 'popular war'. God bless our troops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Hoodlum91
"Don’t you know that Syria and Iran are just innocent countries being wrongly harrassed by the US and Israel?"

The rhetoric for THAT one was prepared right after the SOTU naming Iran as part of the Axis of evil: "The country has long considered Al Qaida an enemy, and polls show that the Iranian public is among the most pro-Western of any country in the Middle East."

Americans are plenty stupid enough to think the Iranian government is representative of the Iranian people, and that Iranian-backed terrorist groups are innocent victims of American Imperialism and would be really nice to us if we were nicer to them.

174 posted on 09/20/2007 6:56:08 AM PDT by cake_crumb (May I never live to see the day America has a 'popular war'. God bless our troops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

What a weak chin he has.


175 posted on 09/20/2007 6:57:45 AM PDT by cake_crumb (May I never live to see the day America has a 'popular war'. God bless our troops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: mojito

There appears to be a big chill or absence of facts here. Given the possiblity a major NBC Depot was “flatten” by IAF F-15s in Syria; echos in a silent scream.


176 posted on 09/20/2007 7:13:26 AM PDT by Broker (Mabuhay!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

The Mideast is not Russia or China and you compare them at your own risk. Iraq and Syria were not enemies. They had a lot of higher level interaction. There WAS an illegal oil pipeline running millios of barrels or oil into Syria for years...UN inspectors somehow missed that.


177 posted on 09/20/2007 7:15:35 AM PDT by cake_crumb (May I never live to see the day America has a 'popular war'. God bless our troops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: mojito
The JP can't spell Kippur correctly?

Carolyn

178 posted on 09/20/2007 7:18:42 AM PDT by CDHart ("It's too late to work within the system and too early to shoot the b@#$%^&s."--Claire Wolfe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush

Mitch Rapp bump (truth is stranger than fiction)


179 posted on 09/20/2007 7:41:54 AM PDT by wordsofearnest (Thompson-Hunter not Hunter Thompson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: wordsofearnest

Mitch Rapp indeed. Lotsa action and nobody’s talkin’


180 posted on 09/20/2007 8:16:26 AM PDT by Broker (Mabuhay!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-193 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson