He's got to be proud of that prison study that has spawned so many reality shows on TV.
Posted on 09/18/2007 7:23:44 AM PDT by SmithL
Stanford University faculty members are protesting former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld's appointment as a visiting fellow at the Hoover Institution.
Renowned professor emeritus of psychology Philip Zimbardo, who has publicly blamed Rumsfeld and other Bush Administration officials for the notorious abuses at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq, is among a protest petition's "instigators," as he put it.
"We think he has distinguished himself for all the wrong things than what the university should stand for and what America should stand for," Zimbardo said Monday, adding that about 118 people had signed the petition by Sunday, but the number should increase rapidly when the academic quarter begins next week.
The Hoover Institution announced Sept. 7 that Rumsfeld will be a visiting fellow serving on a task force of scholars and experts focused upon issues pertaining to "ideology and terror."
"Hoover is in a sense independent of Stanford but it's always linked to Stanford," Zimbardo said.
The conservative public-policy think tank is located on the university's campus, but the faculty senate has no input on its appointments.
"They can have any fascist they want there, and they do ... We've never protested before but this seems to be egregious," Zimbardo said.
The Hoover Institution didn't return calls seeking comment Monday.
Rumsfeld resigned as defense secretary in November, a day after frustration with his handling of the Iraq war was cited as a source of voter dissatisfaction contributing to Republicans' loss of majority control in Congress. By then, some Republican members of Congress had joined with Democrats in urging President Bush to dump Rumsfeld.
Zimbardo, 74, is perhaps best known for his 1971 Stanford prison experiment in which students assigned to be guards in a mock prison in a campus basement quickly became sadistic. At the same time, the students chosen to be prisoners soon showed passivity and depression, quickly leading to dangerous and psychologically harmful situations that forced him to end the experiment.
In 2004, he testified for the defense in the court martial of U.S. Army Staff Sgt. Ivan Frederick, a guard at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq, arguing that the soldier's sentence should be mitigated because few people can resist the urge to become abusive in such an environment without proper training and supervision. Frederick still received the maximum sentence of eight years in prison. Zimbardo repeatedly and publicly has blamed Rumsfeld and other Bush Administration officials for the Abu Ghraib abuses, most prominently in his book published this year, "The Lucifer Effect: Understanding How Good People Turn Evil."
On that book's Web site, Zimbardo says Rumsfeld "created the conditions for troops to commit war crimes and torture by sidelining and disparaging the Geneva Conventions. He did so by approving interrogation techniques that violated the Geneva Conventions as well as the Convention against Torture, and by approving the hiding of detainees from the International Committee of the Red Cross."
Other former Cabinet members who are fellows or visiting fellows at the Hoover Institution include former Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham, 2001-05 under President Bush; former Defense Secretary William Perry, 1994-97 under President Clinton; former Secretary of State George Shultz, 1982-89 under President Reagan; and former Attorney General Ed Meese, 1985-88 under President Reagan. Current Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice is a senior fellow now on leave from the Hoover Institution, and retired Army Gen. John Abizaid -- who commanded the U.S. Central Command from 2003 through March, with dominion over U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan -- is now a visiting fellow.
He's got to be proud of that prison study that has spawned so many reality shows on TV.
Isn’t that Mitch Miller?
What about diversity? What about “different points of view”? I guess all of that is just meaningless hot air when it comes to the intolerance of ratty old leftist loser loons.
Gee, there's absolutely no biased agenda here whatsoever.
I think he is mistaken. It seems to me that the Reagan Library was initially slated to be on grounds near the Hoover Institution. The faculty organized a vicious protest and the Reagans decided to locate it in Simi Valley. In the pea-brain mindset of Stanford's looney faculty anyone who does not agree with their "hate America agenda" is a fascist.
So, a hypocrite and a liar. Hmmmmm. Anyone surprised that a University Professor has those traits?
No, I think that's Michael Weiner.
So the leftists can petition all they want, and Hoover can still do what it wants? Sweet.
Yet the retraction of far-leftist Erwin Chemerinsky's UCI deanship offer, purportedly due to conservative political pressure, was resoundingly denounced by a wide range of prominent voices on the 'right'. Can we expect to see a parade of prominent leftists denouncing Zimbardo's intemperate outburst aimed at Rumsfeld and Hoover Institute 'fascists'? Don't hold your breath...
Stanford University can have any Communist they want there, and they do...so it all evens out. ;)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.