How can that be? The science was settled. There was consensus.
LOL
And this "revisionism" occurs everywhere ... imagine, the SS LUSTANTIA was indeed carrying contraband. Go figure??
You posted: How can that be? The science was settled. There was consensus.
***
Well said. And how would someone who challenged the prior neutron properties vision have been viewed about two weeks before these new findings were made? I suggest that he or she would have been treated much like global warming skeptics and evolution skeptics are today. Perhaps all of us should be prepared for the possibility that our assumptions may not be entirely correct, and may be completely wrong.
1. Neutron "Oreoists" are just deniers in the pay of Big Oil.
2. We have modified our terminology to refer to "Macro-uncharged nuclear particles" instead of "Neutrons." When you hear "Neutrons" it is probably some Oreoist with an agenda.