Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ditto
Care to explain what "usurpations" were committed by the 'national rulers' in 1860 that justified secession/revolution?

Just read some history. The South was being disproportionately taxed for the benefit of the industrial North. You don't really think the Southerners decided to leave on a whim, do you?

ML/NJ

36 posted on 09/18/2007 1:29:54 PM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: ml/nj
The South was being disproportionately taxed for the benefit of the industrial North.

Total neo confederate myth. And if taxes were the cause, why didn't they say so in their declaration of causes.

You don't really think the Southerners decided to leave on a whim, do you?

No, they left because Lincoln promised to block expansion of slavery in the territories, and the slave owning aristocrats knew they needed continual expansion to keep their slavery Ponzi scheme afloat.

You, my firend are the the one who should read some history.

40 posted on 09/18/2007 1:37:23 PM PDT by Ditto (Global Warming: The 21st Century's Snake Oil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: ml/nj

“Just read some history. The South was being disproportionately taxed for the benefit of the industrial North. You don’t really think the Southerners decided to leave on a whim, do you?”

Well no. The taxes and tariffs that the South groused so much about were applied uniformly across all of the states. There is no act that said “Georgia shall pay this tax...). Yes, the impact of these laws was not uniformly felt. The South as a region took a heavier hit. But those same laws hurt the farmers in PA and NY as they did SC and GA. A countrywide civil war between agrarians and industrialists may have been justifiable. But that little bothersome difference between northern agrarians(who paid their laborers) and southern agrarians(who didn’t) over slavery didn’t make that possible.


45 posted on 09/18/2007 3:02:29 PM PDT by Delacon (When in doubt, ask a liberal and do the opposite.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: ml/nj

You might note the fact that in 1860, the tariffs on cotton were actually reduced (though still high). So are you advocating the position that reducing taxes (as was done) induces rebellion?


162 posted on 09/24/2007 4:08:25 PM PDT by Frumious Bandersnatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson