Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NapkinUser

The problem with electing Ron Paul as president is that we’d end up with liberal government. That’s because Paul’s conservative stances have zero chance of being passed by Congress, while his liberal views would be readily accepted by the powers-that-be in Washington.

This is all theoretical, of course, since Paul isn’t going to be elected. I do admire his backers’ enthusiasm, though. And it’s a real enthusiasm, not the cynical “I’m gonna show how progressive I am by supporting a black guy” enthusiasm of Obama’s backers.


20 posted on 09/16/2007 9:06:12 AM PDT by puroresu (I haven't seen a cute Democrat girl since 1969, and Ted Kennedy killed her)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: puroresu
while his liberal views would be readily accepted by the powers-that-be in Washington.

And what are his liberal views? Everything I've seen from Rep. Paul is based on conservative principle, some of it so long standing that even 'conservatives' have forgotten it was originally conservative principle

26 posted on 09/16/2007 9:08:36 AM PDT by billbears (Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: puroresu

interesting points

FYI:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1888790/posts


54 posted on 09/16/2007 9:22:46 AM PDT by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson