Skip to comments.
Caplan on the Myth of the Rational Voter
http://www.econtalk.org/archives/2007/06/caplan_on_the_m.html ^
Posted on 09/14/2007 11:21:44 AM PDT by lduucckkyy
Bryan Caplan, of George Mason University and blogger at EconLog, talks about his book, The Myth of the Rational Voter: Why Democracies Choose Bad Policies. Caplan argues that democracies work well in giving voters what they want but unfortunately, what voters want isn't particularly wise, especially when it comes to economic policy. He outlines a series of systematic biases we often have on economic topics and explains why we have little or no incentive to improve our understanding of the world and vote wisely. So, it's not special interests that are messing things up but the very incentives that lie at the heart of a vote-based system. This is a disturbing and provocative lens for viewing political outcomes.
TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: bookreview; gmu; myth; rationalvoter
http://www.econtalk.org/archives/2007/06/caplan_on_the_m.html
To: lduucckkyy
Just finished reading this. Good Stuff.
Democratic Fundamentalism is just as flawed an ideology as the Divine Right of Kings.
2
posted on
09/14/2007 11:34:19 AM PDT
by
AdamSelene235
(Truth has become so rare and precious she is always attended to by a bodyguard of lies.)
To: lduucckkyy
DeToqueville(spelling) said long before this guy
3
posted on
09/14/2007 11:49:18 AM PDT
by
uncbob
(m first)
To: AdamSelene235
Bring back property requirements for voting!
/no, I’m not kidding
4
posted on
09/14/2007 11:50:04 AM PDT
by
Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
(Want authentic 1st century Christianity? Visit a local, New Testament Independent Baptist church!)
To: AdamSelene235
Bring back property requirements for voting!
/no, I’m not kidding
5
posted on
09/14/2007 11:50:10 AM PDT
by
Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
(Want authentic 1st century Christianity? Visit a local, New Testament Independent Baptist church!)
To: lduucckkyy
. Caplan argues that democracies work well in giving voters what they want but unfortunately, what voters want isn't particularly wise, especially when it comes to economic policy. Just look at Massachusetts voters who keep returning perverts and Ted Kennedy who should have been indicted for manslaughter in 1969. Maybe Massachusetts voters want them, but they couldn't be elected anywhere else except in the Kennedy white plantation of Massachusetts.
West Virginia keeps re-electing their fairy god-father, Robert Byrd, who started out politically as a KKK Kleagle, being paid $100 for each new recuit, but he is untouchable as the Democratic Senate Majority Leader. No black politician including Obama will go after him because Byrd is a powerful DEMOCRAT.
It does make you wonder about democracy, because the brain-dead also have the vote, and will vote for what they perceive as furthering their self-interests.
6
posted on
09/14/2007 11:57:39 AM PDT
by
xJones
(Real countries have real borders.)
To: AdamSelene235
That's why it supposed to be a Republic.
7
posted on
09/14/2007 11:59:05 AM PDT
by
Little Ray
(Rudy Guiliani: If his wives can't trust him, why should we?)
To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
The electorate that put George Washington in office totalled about 100,000. Enfranchising non-property owners, popular election of Senators, and female suffrage have each had unintended consequences.
That is you wind up with a Kennedy, a Jerry Studds, a Clinton, a JFK, a John Kerry, a Byrd. I.E., you wind up with people that no reasonable property-owning man would permit on the property.
8
posted on
09/14/2007 12:04:38 PM PDT
by
Zerodown
(Petraeus. The next Eisenhower?)
To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
The electorate that put George Washington in office totalled about 100,000. Enfranchising non-property owners, popular election of Senators, and female suffrage have each had unintended consequences.
That is you wind up with a Kennedy, a Jerry Studds, a Clinton, a JFK, a John Kerry, a Byrd. I.E., you wind up with people that no reasonable property-owning man would permit on the property.
9
posted on
09/14/2007 12:05:01 PM PDT
by
Zerodown
(Petraeus. The next Eisenhower?)
To: Zerodown
Damn internet hiccops, don't you just hate them?:)
From painful experience, I've learned to hit the post button and wait. Sometimes it takes a while.
10
posted on
09/14/2007 12:16:29 PM PDT
by
xJones
(Real countries have real borders.)
To: lduucckkyy
11
posted on
09/14/2007 12:18:12 PM PDT
by
Amalie
(FREEDOM had NEVER been another word for nothing left to lose...)
To: Amalie
With 85% high school graduation rate and the internet you have the most literate and best informed electorate in history.
12
posted on
09/14/2007 12:24:04 PM PDT
by
ClaireSolt
(Have you have gotten mixed up in a mish-masher?)
Two things that would help our democracy would be term limits and line-item veto.
13
posted on
09/14/2007 12:29:39 PM PDT
by
webboy45
To: lduucckkyy
I’ve known Bryan since Kindergarten. WE grew up two blocks from each other. Have you taken his libertarian purity test?
14
posted on
09/14/2007 12:31:12 PM PDT
by
hoppity
To: webboy45
Two things that would help our “democracy” would be repealing the Sixteenth and Seventeenth amendments to the Constitution.
15
posted on
09/14/2007 12:33:42 PM PDT
by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
Property requirements, and federalism - remove the power of the federal government to redistribute wealth,
and you’d have everything darn near fixed.
16
posted on
09/14/2007 12:36:05 PM PDT
by
MrB
(You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
To: DuncanWaring
Don’t forget the 14th, and its twisted application by the courts to basically repeal the 9th and 10th amendments.
17
posted on
09/14/2007 12:37:02 PM PDT
by
MrB
(You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
To: lduucckkyy
18
posted on
09/14/2007 1:59:13 PM PDT
by
Matchett-PI
(The DemocRAT Party is a Criminal Enterprise)
To: xJones
I've learned to hit the post button and wait. Sometimes it takes a while.Look at the bright side. According to my children, me saying the same thing just twice would be a refreshing change.
19
posted on
09/14/2007 2:32:47 PM PDT
by
Zerodown
(Petraeus. The next Eisenhower?)
To: Zerodown
Look at the bright side. According to my children, me saying the same thing just twice would be a refreshing change.LOL!
Fortunately, my children have never said that to me.
Fortunately, my children have never said that to me.
20
posted on
09/14/2007 2:40:39 PM PDT
by
xJones
(Real countries have real borders.)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson