>Are you being intentionally dense or do you really not understand? It’s my position that you don’t need all all of the things you say to define a threat, that the specific breed alone is enough to define a threat.<
When you have no answer to an argument, resorting to ad hominum attacks just cements that reality.
Any large dog presents some level of threat, especially if it’s with other dogs (that’s a pack for those of you in Rio Linda). That’s why experts recommend males be castrated at a young age, and that’s why communities have laws that forbid allowing any dog to roam at large.
100% correct.
You have no argument. When someone tells me my position is the exact opposite of what I said, particularly in their words not mine, there is something wrong. So when someone is that far off they're either missing the point or being a jerk. I asked you which it was. I asked you before and I'll ask you again So which was it?