I met in Los Angeles a few months ago with John Emshwiller and told him the story. His first comment was to ask why no one has written about this. I had some ideas — 1) it is a complicated story, 2) many reporters want Hillary to win, and 3) many eidtors and reporters are afraid of her.
Finally, we have a reporter in the mainsteam media that is telling the voters that Hillary is soon going to be under oath and that this case is going to court.
Now -— Rush and Drudge, start talking about this.
re: Their attorney, David Kendall, says there was never any business arrangement discussed or contemplated between Mr. Paul and Mr. Clinton.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
What a lying weasel SOB. If Paul was a horrible felon, if he gave no money, if there was no business relationship, why would the President of the United States invite him to meet him as AF-1 landed in Los Angeles on Sept. 22, 2000? For what possible purpose?
WRONG
Mr. Paul became a problem for Mrs. Clinton when it was revealed that she was an active participant in organizing the $1.6 Million event for her benefit.
BUMP
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Rendell, you lying SOB. Rendell never declared a $100,000 contribution made by Peter on June 8, 2000 - a fundraiser for which he paid at the Beverly Hills Hotel for Al Gore. The hotel cost $80,000, and Olivia Newton-John charged $20,000 for two songs. Rendell never reported a $150K stock pledge. After Aaron Tonken was indicted in California for ripping off charities, he was wearing a government wire in a conversation with Rendell. Rendell tried to bribe him with a 100K per year job in Pennsylvania. Why didn't the Justice Dept do something about that?
Here is the callsheet two days after the Aug. 12 event. Rendell called in an emergency to tell Peter that Lloyd Grove would be coming out with a story the next day. Peter should just play along and say he didn't give any money. Things would eventually blow over.
Hillary and her people knew all about Peter’s past. He had been vette six times previously by the Secret Service.
Always watching ya, DFU.
Great job. WSJ has more resources than most of the rest of us. Let’s hope it lingers like herpes on that harpie.
Now that the WSJ has opened the door, we need all of you to call newspapers and tv stations and radio shows and ask about this story. Ask about Hillary being under oath soon. Thanks.
Good job. I’m watching.
Who has the Rush transcript from Thursday? He mentioned the money spent by Hsu and that no one spends that much money without wanting something. How in the world can lying weasel David Kendall convince anyone that Peter Paul spent $1.6 mil just because he was a true believer? That is insane. No one does that.
I had hoped for a better story, but John has now gotten it out there. When the plaintiff is described as a felon, it might be fair to describe the defendant as a perjurer, suborner of perjury, intimidator of witnesses, and an impeached rapist who lost his law license and turned in a false affidavit to the court.
If any of you have time, please do the following:
- go the news.google.com
- find all the reporters who have written about Hsu
- call their newspapers (get that from www.superpages.com)
- tell the reporter you saw this story and you would like to know more about it
If any of you have the contacts, get me on talk radio. I will go on any show any time in any market. If you have a Republican group and can provide a plane ticket and a room, I’ll go anywhere, show our film, give a speech, and answer questions.
Yes, Peter was a convicted felon from the late 1970s. You know what he did? He participated in an operation that ripped off Fidel Castro for 8.7 mil. That was a great thing. He would not have had a 10b5 stock manipulation charge had Clinton not destroyed his company.