Poor leftist moonbats. They really don't like counter-protests very much, do they?
1 posted on
09/13/2007 7:00:26 AM PDT by
TChris
To: TChris
I didn't like it when the leftwingnutz attempted to interfere with General Petraeus report the other day.
We already knew what the leftwingnutz had to say too ~ .
2 posted on
09/13/2007 7:03:54 AM PDT by
muawiyah
To: TChris
How terrible. Maybe the State should silence those who try to silence others in the name of free speech.
Unless it shouldn’t.
3 posted on
09/13/2007 7:04:22 AM PDT by
AppyPappy
(If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
To: TChris
More excuses from the Commies to quiet opposing viewpoints. I’m sure the Dems will find a way to investigate and make laws about “civilian mobs.”
To: TChris
I thought from the citation that this was a pundit, but it appears to be a letter to the editor. Perhaps everyone else saw this without having to note that, but given that this is a personal opinion, it is just moonbattery not the dangerous propaganda an actual pundit could pursue.
I wonder who wrote it for him, however?
5 posted on
09/13/2007 7:07:29 AM PDT by
BelegStrongbow
(www.stjosephssanford.org: Ecce Pactum, id cape aut id relinque)
To: TChris
So let me get this straight, it's O.K. for moonbats to chant and disrupt events, but when Conservative counter-protesters show up to exercise their 1st Amendment rights as well, it's a fascist dictatorship?
Unbelievable!
To: TChris
the Bush administration has also created civilian gangs, called "rally squads," to antagonize protesters and demonstrators.I don't believe this for a second. I would have read about "rally squads" somewhere in the past thousand hours or so of my FR surfing.
7 posted on
09/13/2007 7:10:34 AM PDT by
jiggyboy
(Ten per cent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
To: TChris
Well then they’ll love this Saturday coming up!
9 posted on
09/13/2007 7:17:37 AM PDT by
wastedyears
(George Orwell was a clairvoyant.)
To: JMK
10 posted on
09/13/2007 7:17:51 AM PDT by
JMK
(One of the lucky few -- escaped from NJ during the Florio years!)
To: TChris
They aren’t used to be challenged. The lamestream media certainly never questions or criticizes them. They can’t fathom the thought that someone might disagree with them. Leftists never acknowledge the possibility that they could be wrong, or that another might have a legitimate disagreement with them. Liberals are the ones who brook no dissent. You either agree with liberals, or you are shouted down and ostracized. So much for the vaunted "diversity". Libs are all for "diversity", as long as it is "diverse" like them.
11 posted on
09/13/2007 7:19:20 AM PDT by
chimera
To: TChris
“The New York Times called these American civilian gangs “vigilante squads” and said they “are out of place in a democracy.”
The article clearly states that these are citizen ‘volunteers’ whose voices must be silenced. The left is becoming more and more hostile to free speech.
13 posted on
09/13/2007 7:56:54 AM PDT by
Spok
To: TChris
Just what you would expect coming out of a guy named ROACH.
14 posted on
09/13/2007 8:00:19 AM PDT by
dforest
(Duncan Hunter is the best hope we have on both fronts.)
To: TChris
Dear Ny Slimes,
I am sure that you are busy investigating all the lawless left-wing “vigilante gangs” of anti-war, anti-Bush, anarchist, anti-globalization, and all-around anti-Republican hateful nutjobs who have committed so many CRIMES over the past few years..... RIGHT?? You couldn’t be ignoring all the crime and depravity committed by your friends, could you?
15 posted on
09/13/2007 8:00:54 AM PDT by
Enchante
(Reid and Pelosi Defeatocrats: Surrender Now - Peace for Our Time!!)
To: TChris
17 posted on
09/14/2007 5:08:44 AM PDT by
Edgerunner
(If you won't let the military fight your battles, you will have to. Keep your powder dry...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson