Skip to comments.
GOP's Ron Paul wants all troops home
Seattle Post-Intelligencer ^
| 09/12/07
| JOEL CONNELLY
Posted on 09/12/2007 7:21:50 AM PDT by presidio9
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 561-579 next last
To: Primetimedonna
Posted before I read yours. GMTA, my FRiend~!
61
posted on
09/12/2007 8:07:43 AM PDT
by
Fudd Fan
(SNOW-Flake, Levinte, Steve-adore and FREDHEAD~!)
To: angelcindy
“I swear he sounds like a ranting liberal”
This anti-war pull our troops out now cult like following Paul has smells allot like a Lyndon LaRouche campaign. I really doubt his supporters are Republicans or libertarians (little L). These are Tinfoil-hat Internet junkies.
To: Ditter
I am embarrassed that this weenie is from Texas. The sooner he loses the better.
I hope that the CD can find a viable alternative candidate that can defeat Paul in the primary. Since his district spreads across many counties I don’t know if there is one candidate who is well enough known to beat him.
I think he’ll be in the Presidential primary until the bitter end much like Keyes was in 2000. Paul doesn’t need a lot of money to continue his run the way his campaign operates. And with fundraisers like the one mentioned in this article of $1,000 a person and the one where he collected over a $100,000 in Dallas a few weeks ago will provide more than ample money for him.
He’ll get some primary support and delegates as the alternate candidate to who ever comes out as the eventual winner but not near enough to have a major impact at the convention. My hope is he’s denied a spot on the rosturm at the convention.
63
posted on
09/12/2007 8:08:49 AM PDT
by
deport
(>>>--Keep your powder dry--<<< [ Meanwhile:-- Cue Spooky Music--])
To: presidio9
Our role is not...to be world policeman."If we don't do it, someone else will. And I don't think anyone is going to like the results.
We had the luxury of being isolationist in the early part of our history, but technological advances have made it so that isolationism is no longer feasible.
64
posted on
09/12/2007 8:09:06 AM PDT
by
dfwgator
(The University of Florida - Still Championship U)
To: expatguy; George W. Bush
Yeah “George W. Bush.” A freeper that posts drivel that contrasts things our real POTUS would say. It is a black mark on FR that they awarded this freeper our sitting POTUS’s name. This freeper has no respect or honor for invoking our POTUS’s name while posting some of the nonsense he does and supporting a loon like Ron Paul, who would be better in a straight jacket than in the halls of Congress.
65
posted on
09/12/2007 8:11:11 AM PDT
by
jrooney
(The democrats are the friend of our enemy and the enemy of our friends. Attack them, not GW!)
To: ccmay
Very interesting. From what I can see, his positions are more conservative than liberal on balance, but he's got the college kiddies swooning just because of his opposition to the Iraq war.The liberal/socialist/pacifist tags are disinformation from the troll patrol that cannot tolerate discussion. As the only anti-war candidate, he's likely to pick up some very strange bedfellows, but a vote's a vote.
To: Primetimedonna
What a coincidence! I want Ron Paul to go home too!! ;.)Well, if he wants to bring the troops home because they involve us in international affairs, it's only fair we should want him to go home and stop involving himself in our affairs.
67
posted on
09/12/2007 8:11:23 AM PDT
by
bcsco
("The American Indians found out what happens when you don't control immigration.")
To: mnehrling
there is one that is far more disturbing, the creation of a Federal Child Tracking Database. (ala Digital Angel.)I hadn't heard about that one. It is FAR more disturbing.
68
posted on
09/12/2007 8:13:18 AM PDT
by
MEGoody
(Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
To: presidio9
“And U.S. troops in Europe?
“I would get them home,” Paul said in an interview Tuesday. “Having them stationed abroad doesn’t serve our national interest, and that goes for forces in Japan and Korea. “
As if we needed further proof that this guy is an idiot when it comes to foreign policy.
When you become president, you cannot summarily deny decades of commitments made by those whom you may not have agreed with.
To: MEGoody
70
posted on
09/12/2007 8:20:35 AM PDT
by
mnehring
(Thompson/Hunter '08- Time to have the real men in charge!)
To: Madeleine Ward
When I lived in Texas, he was a Libertarian.
Paul orginally ran and won his CD seat as a Republican. He resigned after 6 yrs [self imposed term limit] and ran as the Libertarian Party Presidential candidate. After losing that he returned to the Republican party and ran again for the CD seat which he won and has held ever since. He runs as a Republican in order to have a chance at being elected is my opinion. Hopefully someone with enough district wide acceptance can unseat him in the primary this time around.
71
posted on
09/12/2007 8:21:47 AM PDT
by
deport
(>>>--Keep your powder dry--<<< [ Meanwhile:-- Cue Spooky Music--])
To: MEGoody
72
posted on
09/12/2007 8:23:10 AM PDT
by
mnehring
(Thompson/Hunter '08- Time to have the real men in charge!)
To: US at Risk
Welcome to Free Republic.
73
posted on
09/12/2007 8:23:20 AM PDT
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: Post-Neolithic
I might have been able to repect his view in respect to the troops in Iraq, I.E. get then out as soon as possible(assuming we have the situation stable over there), but in the same breath he wants to pull out all our troops around the world. To say nothing of saying that Iran wasnt a problem and we should just let them be. This guy is a loon of the highest order.
I agree on the stability issue and am holding for more information. RP is dumb like a fox, making people howl with outrage at his sound bites while others take a deeper look to see what the fuss is about.
He never said Iran wasn't a problem. He has said that historically the US should not have worked with England to depose Mossadeq. I agree with him on this point. In the present day, he feels that there's a good enough balance of power in the ME to contain Iran. I think this is credible, too, especially if we leave Iraq in good shape.
To: US at Risk
As the only anti-war candidate, he's likely to pick up some very strange bedfellows, but a vote's a vote.Uh, huh. Kinda like "The end justifies the means".
75
posted on
09/12/2007 8:34:06 AM PDT
by
bcsco
("The American Indians found out what happens when you don't control immigration.")
To: US at Risk
He never said Iran wasn't a problem. No, I believe his exact words were:
They (Iran) are acting logically and defensively and we have no reason to fear them.
76
posted on
09/12/2007 8:34:58 AM PDT
by
mnehring
(Thompson/Hunter '08- Time to have the real men in charge!)
To: MEGoody
Seems very strange to me that some think it is constitutional to allow the taking of innocent life.IMO, condoning, nay, PROMOTING abortion at the federal level gives states a free pass on this issue. RP talks about actively seeking to overthrow R v. W, which would be a monumental advancement.
To: presidio9
I cannot believe I once supported this buffoon.
78
posted on
09/12/2007 8:37:49 AM PDT
by
meandog
(I'm one of the FEW and the BRAVE FReepers still supporting John McCain)
To: ClearCase_guy
...if he has so little in common with the Republican Party.Constitutional conservatives have so little in common with freerepublic. It took 15 posts before a freeper acknowledged Ron Paul actually follows the constitution. I remember when freerepublic was a conservative forum...of course, that was before Jim Robinson embraced undeclared pre-emptive wars.
79
posted on
09/12/2007 8:40:50 AM PDT
by
Nephi
( $100m ante is a symptom of the old media... the Ron Paul Revolution is the new media's choice.)
To: Ron Paul
It's time for your medication Ronnie.
80
posted on
09/12/2007 8:45:10 AM PDT
by
BubbaBasher
(WWW.TWFRED08.COM)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 561-579 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson