Thanks for your kind and speedy reply after only about 8 minutes after my post when you didn't have time to post and deemed me unworthy of your valuable time. Thanks especially that you did so, in spite of posting previously that you didn't play "YOUR GAMES."
And thanks for yet another funny display of your proven flair for unintended irony and self-contradiction you declare "game, set, match." But, but, you don't play games.
I never condemned Schlafly or attacked her character. I said that she was prone to misstatements or exaggerations and I backed that up with specific quotes from her. I then compared her quotes with the SPP Flu Plan as you refuse to provide the actual, initial, and original SPP itself.
No matter how many times you reply, you can't do something that would be an easy way to confirm the Schlafly statements questioned by me, if it were possible.
You can NOT link or cite the actual text of the original 2005 SPP (even though you claim to have read it) and you can NOT cite one example of a legislative power delegated to a foreign official as claimed by Schlafly.
Your serve or did your "little time" of several posts back require you to leave the court? :)
You’ve posted nothing but your empty opinions...again.
Get back to me when you have something credible to state (hint: your opinions are NOT credible).
You can NOT link or cite the actual text of the original 2005 SPP (even though you claim to have read it) and you can NOT cite one example of a legislative power delegated to a foreign official as claimed by Schlafly. I don't have time, and, therefore, refuse to do YOUR homework, though you claim to be knowledgeable and all-knowing about the SPP, you obviously only intend to post on this thread to attack and character assassinate Schlafly.
For this reason, I REFUSE to provide links to anything FOR you. You are playing a game, and I won't be played. Therefore, the game you are TRYING to play was over from the beginning: game, set, and match. We all got your number from the get go.