Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton to Return $850,000 Raised by Hsu
Las Vegas Sun ^ | : September 10, 2007 at 16:40:4 PDT | LARA JAKES JORDAN

Posted on 09/10/2007 4:44:57 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

WASHINGTON (AP) -

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's presidential campaign said Monday it will return $850,000 in donations raised by Democratic fundraiser Norman Hsu, who is under federal investigation for violating election laws.

Clinton, D-N.Y., previously had planned only to give to charity $23,000 she received from Hsu for her presidential and senatorial campaigns and to her political action committee, HillPac.

The FBI is investigating whether Hsu paid so-called straw donors to send campaign contributions to Clinton and other candidates, a law enforcement official said Monday.

--


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: arkancide; clintontong; corruptclinton; corruptdems; corruption; corruptrats; fraud; hillary; hitlery; hsu; irsfraud; normanhsu; payoff; secfraud; thief; whitewater
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 301-316 next last
To: Enchante; Ernest_at_the_Beach; doug from upland

“Guaranteed, if Shrillery is giving up nearly $1 million this quickly then there is an incredible cesspool underlying this whole scam, waiting to be exposed and drained. WaPo and the LA Times are both referring to the feds investigating a “shady business venture” in which Hsu allegedly provided “investors” with unusual returns and then leaned on them for political contributions. That would be a much bigger scandal than a known felon “bundling” contributions — why is Shrillery already returning donations to 260 donors?? This is just the tip of the iceberg!! Did the ChiComs provide the million(s) for Hsu fake investor scam?? Who else would put that kind of money into the thing? Hsu certainly does not seem to have any evident source(s) of such income, so far as all his false-front “company” addresses can indicate! Where was he getting all this money, and how was he laundering it through to the “donors”?? Inquiring minds sure do want to know....”

That was the first thing that ran through my old mind. For Once Hill saw some FBI files that scared the hell out of her.

Hsu’s funding/bundling/bungling is probably small change compared to the ChiComs, Dr $oreA$$’s bundling and money deposited by the Opecker Princes and Thugs.


141 posted on 09/10/2007 5:41:34 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (Donate to Vets For Freedom: http://www.vetsforfreedom.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: All
Updated from the LV Sun:

Clinton to Return $850,000 Raised by Hsu

****************************

By LARA JAKES JORDAN
Associated Press Writer

Clinton to Return $850,000 Raised by Hsu

WASHINGTON (AP) -

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's presidential campaign said Monday it will return $850,000 in donations raised by Democratic fundraiser Norman Hsu, who is under federal investigation for allegedly violating election laws.

Clinton, D-N.Y., previously had planned only to give to charity $23,000 she received from Hsu for her presidential and senatorial campaigns and to her political action committee, HillPac.

The FBI is investigating whether Hsu paid so-called straw donors to send campaign contributions to Clinton and other candidates, a law enforcement official said Monday.

"In light of recent events and allegations that Mr. Norman Hsu engaged in an illegal investment scheme, we have decided out of an abundance of caution to return the money he raised for our campaign," Clinton spokesman Howard Wolfson said in a statement Monday night. "An estimated 260 donors this week will receive refunds totaling approximately $850,000 from the campaign."

Wolfson said the Clinton campaign also will vigorously review its fundraisers, including thorough criminal background checks, in the future. "In any instances where a source of a bundler's income is in question, the campaign will take affirmative steps to verify its origin," he said.

The amount that the campaign identified as raised by Hsu would make him one of her top fundraisers. During the first six months of this year, her presidential campaign raised $52 million from individual contributors, second to Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., who raised $58.5 million.

Since 2004, Hsu has donated $260,000 to Democratic Party groups and federal candidates, and raised hundreds of thousands of additional dollars. He was regarded as a top party fundraiser until recent reports surfaced that he was wanted on a warrant in California in connection with a 1991 grand theft charge.

Federal authorities are looking into whether Hsu leaned on investors to contribute to political candidates after paying them big earnings from a shady business venture he was running, the law enforcement official said. Such a scam - using conduit contributors known as straw donors - is a violation of the Federal Election Campaign Act, which limits how much money individuals can give to candidates and political committees.

The FBI may be looking at other potential charges as well, according to the law enforcement official who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the ongoing investigation.

In addition to the $260,000 he contributed to federal candidates, Hsu also contributed at least $330,000 to state Democratic candidates and state party committees and ballot initiatives during the 2004 and 2006 election cycles. Among the state officials who received money were New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer and New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo. Both have said they would divest their campaigns of the donations.

Additionally, last week Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell said he would donate nearly $40,000 in contributions, and Rep. Mark Udall, D-Colo., said he had donated a $1,000 contribution to a charity that helps soldiers.

The purpose of Hsu's business venture was unclear. The Los Angeles Times reported Monday that it was an investment pool that had recently drawn the suspicion of associates who questioned its legality.

An attorney for Hsu did not immediately respond to a request for comment Monday.

Hsu remained hospitalized in Grand Junction, Colo., where he has been since last week after failing to show up for a California court hearing. It was unclear when he might be returned to California to face the felony theft case.

Hsu pleaded no contest in 1991 to a grand theft charge that accused him of defrauding investors of $1 million. He was facing up to three years in prison when he skipped town before his sentencing in 1992. He finally surrendered to the arrest warrant Aug. 31, but disappeared before last week's hearing where he was expected to turn over his passport and ask a judge to cut his $2 million bail in half.

Wolfson said the Clinton campaign was "unaware of Mr. Hsu's decade-plus old warrant," despite what he described as a thorough review of public records.

Since Thursday, Hsu has been at the Colorado hospital, when he was taken from an eastbound Amtrak train for treatment of an undisclosed ailment. He'd failed to show up for the hearing a day earlier. He is expected to be taken to the Mesa County Jail in Colorado to await extradition proceedings in state court once he is well enough to leave the hospital.

---

Associated Press writer Jim Kuhnhenn contributed to this report.

--

142 posted on 09/10/2007 5:41:42 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Forgotten Man

Lol, maybe after you’ve been here a few more years you’ll enjoy that picture!


143 posted on 09/10/2007 5:42:42 PM PDT by potlatch (MIZARU_ooo_‹(•¿•)›_ooo_MIKAZARU_ooo_‹(•¿•)›_ooo_MAZARU_ooo_‹(•¿•)›_ooo_))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

“Follow the money” BUMP!


144 posted on 09/10/2007 5:43:26 PM PDT by Carlucci
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I guess this Hsu is starting to pinch.

Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)

LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)

145 posted on 09/10/2007 5:43:31 PM PDT by LonePalm (Commander and Chef)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm; Ernest_at_the_Beach; doug from upland; Enchante; STARWISE

Don’t you love their timing re their announcements.

They had to be really scared not set on this until Friday after 6 pm or on Sat/Sun.


146 posted on 09/10/2007 5:43:35 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (Donate to Vets For Freedom: http://www.vetsforfreedom.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Thanks for this excellent and clear summary and timeline re the $itch.

Her first position: “I’m not giving any back.”
Her second position: “I will give back $23,000.”
Her third position: “I will give back $850,000.”
MSM’s consistent position: “Nothing to see here.”


147 posted on 09/10/2007 5:45:21 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (Donate to Vets For Freedom: http://www.vetsforfreedom.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave; NormsRevenge; doug from upland; STARWISE; neverdem; Congressman Billybob
From the update at #142.....

During the first six months of this year, her presidential campaign raised $52 million from individual contributors, second to Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., who raised $58.5 million.

148 posted on 09/10/2007 5:46:43 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Tarpon
Hsu, the dimms Jack Abramoff.

Actually, Jack Abramoff is the Dems' Jack Abramoff. Harry Reid received over four times more cash from Abramoff than Tom DeLay received.

149 posted on 09/10/2007 5:47:07 PM PDT by Hoodat ("I get tired of people that are holier than thou because they've been pro-life longer than I have.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Carlucci
“Follow the money” BUMP!

YES, and think about the extraordinary FACT that Shrillery's handlers did not think they could/should stall until 5 pm Friday to try to bury it over the weekend. Is that simply because they thought it even better to try to bury with with the Petraeus/Iraq testimony plus the 9/11 anniversary, or did they have other reasons for not thinking they could hold out until Friday night???

p.s. Maybe now we know why there's such a ludicrous fuss about the Britney-slut in the media today..... distraction, distraction......
150 posted on 09/10/2007 5:48:00 PM PDT by Enchante (Reid and Pelosi Defeatocrats: Surrender Now - Peace for Our Time!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: potlatch

More like when it is a distance memory of a time when we almost had our first female president....then I will enjoy it. Right now it disgusts me....


151 posted on 09/10/2007 5:48:58 PM PDT by The Forgotten Man (He works, he votes, generally he prays--but he always pays....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Return to Sender?


152 posted on 09/10/2007 5:49:30 PM PDT by doug from upland (Our two great challenges: stoppping Islamofascists and stopping Hillary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
"Don’t you love their timing re their announcements. They had to be really scared not set on this until Friday after 6 pm or on Sat/Sun."

Great minds..... I was just posting a similar comment on another thread! Either they did not think they could stall until Friday night or else they cynically decided that the 9/11 Anniversary was an even better way to bury the news??!! Which is it, desperation or the usual Clintonista cynicism?
153 posted on 09/10/2007 5:50:33 PM PDT by Enchante (Reid and Pelosi Defeatocrats: Surrender Now - Peace for Our Time!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: The Forgotten Man; potlatch
Maybe this would be better:

***********************************


154 posted on 09/10/2007 5:50:59 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Enchante
....but it does sound like they’ve both been told by fed sources that there IS such a bogus investment scheme run by Hsu and it’s being unravelled.

You just may be onto something......

From The Prowler this morning:

Another campaign says they are looking into rumors that former President Bill Clinton might also have profited from a relationship with Hsu and some of his business partners.

Chairman Hsu By The Prowler

155 posted on 09/10/2007 5:51:31 PM PDT by MamaLucci (God Bless Our Troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

“”An estimated 260 donors this week will receive refunds totaling approximately $850,000 from the campaign.”

I’m speculating that more than a few will be surprised that they gave anything at all.


156 posted on 09/10/2007 5:51:38 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy; Ernest_at_the_Beach

The Clinton campaign is giving the money back to the donors that Hsu got the money from? Wow, isn’t that the list that the FBI wants to use to investigate this whole sorted affair? I thought Hsu was a bundler, how does the campaign know the names? Just wondering.


157 posted on 09/10/2007 5:52:24 PM PDT by mojo114
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

Oh, I was writing my #150 when you posted this - I should have come back to look at the thread before posting a similar comment, SORRY.... I have too many windows open on my monitor right now!


158 posted on 09/10/2007 5:52:47 PM PDT by Enchante (Reid and Pelosi Defeatocrats: Surrender Now - Peace for Our Time!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Well ....is there a song by that name....my memory is foggy these days.....
159 posted on 09/10/2007 5:53:24 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: jdm

Hillary’s 260 strawman donors should be indicted and prosecuted as part of the racket.


160 posted on 09/10/2007 5:54:14 PM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 301-316 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson