Skip to comments.
Clinton to Return $850,000 Raised by Hsu
Las Vegas Sun ^
| : September 10, 2007 at 16:40:4 PDT
| LARA JAKES JORDAN
Posted on 09/10/2007 4:44:57 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
WASHINGTON (AP) -
Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's presidential campaign said Monday it will return $850,000 in donations raised by Democratic fundraiser Norman Hsu, who is under federal investigation for violating election laws.
Clinton, D-N.Y., previously had planned only to give to charity $23,000 she received from Hsu for her presidential and senatorial campaigns and to her political action committee, HillPac.
The FBI is investigating whether Hsu paid so-called straw donors to send campaign contributions to Clinton and other candidates, a law enforcement official said Monday.
--
TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: arkancide; clintontong; corruptclinton; corruptdems; corruption; corruptrats; fraud; hillary; hitlery; hsu; irsfraud; normanhsu; payoff; secfraud; thief; whitewater
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 301-316 next last
To: Enchante
Exactly right. There will be wall to wall Sept 11th coverage and Patreus testimony tomorrow to give cover to the Clinton/Chinese $$$ connections. They may be shifty traitors but they're media savy. Move along. Nothing to see here. Bush's fault.
121
posted on
09/10/2007 5:31:34 PM PDT
by
Liberty Valance
(Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
To: Enchante
I agree, this is the tip of the iceberg.
I do hope she gets scrutized for this and I want to see the cancelled check when she returns it and I will not be happy if she donates it to her favorite charity, the Clinton Library...This is so outrageous, I am speechless.
To: rottndog
She'll return it in December 2008... When it comes the Clintons it isn't a matter of "trust but verify" it becomes "verify but don't trust."
123
posted on
09/10/2007 5:32:22 PM PDT
by
engrpat
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
[....I love Johnny Cash and a boy named HSU!!!]
GOOD!!
124
posted on
09/10/2007 5:32:56 PM PDT
by
potlatch
(MIZARU_ooo_‹(•¿•)›_ooo_MIKAZARU_ooo_‹(•¿•)›_ooo_MAZARU_ooo_‹(•¿•)›_ooo_))
To: Enchante
It could also mean that they got scared .. and there’s other stuff we don’t yet know about that they’re trying to pre-empt.
I NEVER underestimate their sleaziness and conniving.
125
posted on
09/10/2007 5:33:03 PM PDT
by
STARWISE
(They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
To: Grampa Dave
![](http://home.att.net/~phildragoo/wsb/media/240742/site1457.JPG)
![](http://tinypic.com/11alte8.jpg)
![](http://aycu31.webshots.com/image/27830/2000314880473379535_rs.jpg)
![](http://aycu32.webshots.com/image/27631/2000044615152286198_rs.jpg)
![](http://cagle.com/working/070901/payne.jpg)
![](http://aycu35.webshots.com/image/25274/2004977363451550147_rs.jpg)
HSU, YOUR SUGAR DADDY NOW, HILL?
126
posted on
09/10/2007 5:33:11 PM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(Donate to Vets For Freedom: http://www.vetsforfreedom.org/)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
127
posted on
09/10/2007 5:34:19 PM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(Donate to Vets For Freedom: http://www.vetsforfreedom.org/)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
128
posted on
09/10/2007 5:34:47 PM PDT
by
sageb1
(This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
129
posted on
09/10/2007 5:34:51 PM PDT
by
hope
To: Enchante
OOOPS, that was supposed to read "...influential liberal, Democratic people like Obama and Edwards who have a powerful interest in seeing Hillary go down in flames....."
The 'image' of Shrillery going down in flames sounds fine, too, but doesn't quite make sense in the context of the rest of the sentence!
130
posted on
09/10/2007 5:35:08 PM PDT
by
Enchante
(Reid and Pelosi Defeatocrats: Surrender Now - Peace for Our Time!!)
To: potlatch
.
Excellent potlatch!
The Dragon Lady can’t stand the sunshine!
$850 thousand -
You can bet there are hidden multiples of that from other convicted felons
Like the Mayor or Miami that was booted for voter fraud
131
posted on
09/10/2007 5:35:16 PM PDT
by
devolve
( -- No -- --You cannot change hair color on photos or videos!--)
To: xcamel
The Chronicle actually had an article. I never thought I’d be turning to Mark Frost for hard news. Still nothing in The Post-Star, of course.
132
posted on
09/10/2007 5:37:05 PM PDT
by
sageb1
(This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
133
posted on
09/10/2007 5:37:32 PM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(Donate to Vets For Freedom: http://www.vetsforfreedom.org/)
To: potlatch
Stop with the picture. The Hildebeast expression looks as if Hsu has one of those latex gloves he swindled from his former investors back in ‘91, inserted into her a**hole....
134
posted on
09/10/2007 5:38:15 PM PDT
by
The Forgotten Man
(He works, he votes, generally he prays--but he always pays....)
To: devolve; Enchante; All
John Fund recounts current Clinto Hsu problems, as well as the previous history with questionable donors.
~~~~~~~
A Bundle of Trouble
You wouldn’t want to be in Hsu’s of Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama.
http://www.opinionjournal.com/diary/?id=110010584
135
posted on
09/10/2007 5:38:15 PM PDT
by
STARWISE
(They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
To: devolve
Thank you devolve, the song came to mind immediately!
136
posted on
09/10/2007 5:39:18 PM PDT
by
potlatch
(MIZARU_ooo_‹(•¿•)›_ooo_MIKAZARU_ooo_‹(•¿•)›_ooo_MAZARU_ooo_‹(•¿•)›_ooo_))
To: daisyscarlett
I do hope she gets scrutized for this and I want to see the cancelled check when she returns it and I will not be happy if she donates it to her favorite charity, the Clinton LibraryShe should have to donate it to the Republican party. Giving it to charity, even a legitimate one, ingratiates her to those receiving that charity. Another reason she should not give it back to the donors is because some of them may have committed a crime when they gave their money and got reimbursed by Hsu. If you want to donate illegally, you should at least lose the money.
To: STARWISE
Oh, yeah, I think they’ve got to be running very scared, no matter how much they hope the MSM will cooperate in minimizing the blowback..... what I find to be a very hopeful sign is that neither WaPo nor the LA Times hedged by saying a “possible” sham investment scheme or even “alleged” which is the usual boilerplate. Maybe they’re both being very careless, but it does sound like they’ve both been told by fed sources that there IS such a bogus investment scheme run by Hsu and it’s being unravelled. If not, if there were not already good leads for investigators on such a money-laundering scheme, then both WaPo and the LA Times were extremely careless in their language and even may have opened themselves up to libel action.
138
posted on
09/10/2007 5:39:35 PM PDT
by
Enchante
(Reid and Pelosi Defeatocrats: Surrender Now - Peace for Our Time!!)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
FWI, she decides AFTER she finds out Hsu is still alive ...and the FBI has an interest in him.....
139
posted on
09/10/2007 5:40:11 PM PDT
by
mo
To: counterpunch
Not to mention the fine levied on ACT. All too late, of course. It got the Dems elected in Nov. and Hillary really doesn’t need the money.
140
posted on
09/10/2007 5:40:14 PM PDT
by
sageb1
(This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 301-316 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson